to Compare Two Well Popularized Methods of Inferior Nasal Turbinectomy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 50
- 主要终点
- quality of life
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of the study is to compare endoscopic submucosal inferior turbinectomy to blunt turbinectomy in terms of subjective and objective parameters.
详细描述
The two methods of nasal inferior turbinectomy are well popularized and in use for long periods of time. Endoscopic submucosal inferior turbinectomy is performed in our hospital and blunt turbinectomy is performed usually in privat clinics outside the hospital where there is no endoscopic equipment. We will examine both subjective (QOL questionaire) and objective parameters(rhinomanometry- a non invasive method to evaluate nasal airflow, saccharine test, nasal endoscopy) in our comparison of the outcome of these two methods.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 80 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •all patients above 18 years
排除标准
- •can not answer a written questionaire
研究组 & 干预措施
A1
since the two methods of turbinectomy are in used on a regular basis there is no way to perform double blind study- both the surgeon and the patients are well aware of the operation they are about to go. we just compare several parameters in patients who are anyway about to undergo an operation in a specific method that is used by their surgeon
干预措施: bilateral nasal inferior turbinectomy (Procedure)
A2
the resection of the inferior turbinates will be performed endonasally with an endoscopical instruments
干预措施: endoscopic submucosal resection of the inferior turbinates (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
quality of life
时间窗: 1 year
次要结局
- rhinomanometry, saccharine test, nasal endoscopy(1 year)