Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04051411
NCT04051411
Unknown
Not Applicable

The Effects of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation on Cardiac Structure and Function, Symptoms, and Exercise Capacity

Atlantic Health System1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentAugust 7, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Mitral Regurgitation
Sponsor
Atlantic Health System
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in mitral regurgitant volume
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend that patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation be considered for mitral valve surgery. There remains a debate within the cardiology community regarding the appropriate management of patients who remain asymptomatic. In this study the investigators will perform longitudinal follow-up data with cardiac MRI to inform the prophylactic surgery vs. close follow-up debate and to better define the natural history of this condition. The investigators hypothesize, that in the majority of patients mitral regurgitation will not worsen overtime, left ventricular hemodynamics will remain stable, exercise capacity will not decline, and symptoms will not worsen during follow-up. This finding would have a significant impact on the current recommendations for treatment in patients with mitral regurgitation by supporting a conservative management approach.

Detailed Description

Current ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation be considered for mitral valve surgery. There remains a debate within the cardiology community regarding the appropriate management of patients who remain asymptomatic. There are those who advocate for performing early "prophylactic" mitral valve surgery while others advocate clinical follow-up until triggers emerge with echocardiography historically being the method used for longitudinal assessment of cardiac anatomy and function. Two studies showed that only \~30% of asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation made endpoints that triggered. However, these studies were limited and did not perform rigorous follow up assessment of regurgitant volume, left ventricular hemodynamics, exercise capacity, or quality of life assessment. In addition, in these studies mitral regurgitation and left ventricular size and function was assessed by echocardiography. Echocardiography has known limitations in assessing ventricular size and, as recent studies have shown, may not be the optimal modality to assess mitral regurgitant severity. MRI is the gold standard for non-invasive quantification of the left and right ventricles volumes and function and has emerged as a reference standard for quantifying mitral regurgitation. In this study the investigators will perform longitudinal follow-up data with cardiac MRI to inform the prophylactic surgery vs. close follow-up debate and to better define the natural history of this condition. The investigators hypothesize, that in the majority of patients mitral regurgitation will not worsen overtime, left ventricular hemodynamics will remain stable, exercise capacity will not decline, and symptoms will not worsen during follow-up. This finding would have a significant impact on the current recommendations for treatment in patients with mitral regurgitation by supporting a conservative management approach.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 7, 2019
End Date
January 2024
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Seth Uretsky

Medical Director, Cardiovascular Imaging

Atlantic Health System

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age \>=18 yrs
  • able to give informed consent
  • Diagnoses of moderate or severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (based on the integrated approach recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction \<60%
  • Heart failure
  • Pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure \>40mmHg at rest or \>60mmHg with exercise as assessed by echocardiography)
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Concomitant \> mild aortic or mitral stenosis, \>mild aortic or tricuspid or pulmonic regurgitation
  • Prior valvular heart disease surgery
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or an infiltrative cardiomyopathy
  • Unable to exercise on a treadmill
  • Symptomatic coronary artery disease
  • Comorbidities expected to impact functional capacity and confound symptom assessment (e.g COPD)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in mitral regurgitant volume

Time Frame: Entry into study, 1 year, and 2 years

Change in mitral regurgitant volume quantified by MRI over follow-up period

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume(Entry into study, 1 year, and 2 years)
  • Change in symptoms and quality(Entry into study, 1 year, and 2 years)
  • Change in exercise capacity(Entry into study, 1 year, and 2 years)
  • Follow up events(1 yea, and 2 years)
  • Change in degree of myocardial fibrosis(Entry into study, 1 year, and 2 years)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials