Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00375830
NCT00375830
Completed
Phase 2

Combined 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/MRI for Detection of Skeletal Metastases

Stanford University1 site in 1 country114 target enrollmentJanuary 2006

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Bone scan
Conditions
Cancer
Sponsor
Stanford University
Enrollment
114
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Cohort 1 - NaF PET/CT vs 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This clinical trial studies the use of sodium fluorine-18 (18F-NaF) plus fluorine-18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/ whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) to detect skeletal metastases in patients with stage III-IV breast cancer or stage II-IV prostate cancer.

Detailed Description

Eligible participants had previously received a bone scan using the radiolabel 99mTc-methyl diphosphonate (t99-MDP) as part of their regular medical care. 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG are radioactive substances (radiolabels) that are absorbed by cancerous cells and allow for the cancer to be found using diagnostic procedures such as positron emission tomography (PET)/ whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI). PET/WBMRI is a combination procedure that combines the detailed PET images of areas inside the body from PET with the WBMRI scans, and may help find and diagnose skeletal metastases in patients with breast or prostate cancer. It is not yet known whether 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/WBMRI is better than standard imaging methods in detecting skeletal metastases. Eligible participants diagnosed with breast/prostate cancers and who have had 99mTc MDP bone scanning as part of their routine care are recruited and enrolled. Participants then receive an 18F-NaF/18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/ WBMRI combination scan. The PET/MRI scans will be interpreted by 2 American Board Nuclear Medicine (ABNM)-certified physicians and 2 American Board of Radiology (ABR)-certified radiologists, all with significant clinical experience, who are blinded to the subjects' medical history and the results of other imaging modalities. The scans will be analyzed and compared against each other, with a consensus read will be obtained for each scan. Characterization of lesions as true-positive, true-negative, false-positive or false-negative will be done through a combination of clinical follow-up, imaging follow-up and/or histopathology findings. An overall diagnosis based on each scan will be determined on a 5-point scale (1=benign, 2=likely benign, 3=uncertain, 4=likely malignant, 5=malignant) to conduct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. If the diagnosis is positive for metastases on any of the scans, the investigator will identify the number of lesions and locations of positivity, and record this information. Clinical is obtained at about 12 months after the initial scans.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2006
End Date
March 14, 2019
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Sequential
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Andrei Iagaru

Professor of Radiology (Nuclear Medicine)

Stanford University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Cohort 1 Pilot-WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Preliminary pilot assessment to confirm feasibility \& improved diagnostic accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET scan procedures, as compared to the regular medical care procedure, 99mTc MDP bone scans.

Intervention: Bone scan

Cohort 1 Pilot-WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Preliminary pilot assessment to confirm feasibility \& improved diagnostic accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET scan procedures, as compared to the regular medical care procedure, 99mTc MDP bone scans.

Intervention: 99mTc-methyl diphosphonate

Cohort 1 Pilot-WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Preliminary pilot assessment to confirm feasibility \& improved diagnostic accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET scan procedures, as compared to the regular medical care procedure, 99mTc MDP bone scans.

Intervention: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan

Cohort 1 Pilot-WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Preliminary pilot assessment to confirm feasibility \& improved diagnostic accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET scan procedures, as compared to the regular medical care procedure, 99mTc MDP bone scans.

Intervention: 18F-Fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)

Cohort 1 Pilot-WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Preliminary pilot assessment to confirm feasibility \& improved diagnostic accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET scan procedures, as compared to the regular medical care procedure, 99mTc MDP bone scans.

Intervention: Computed Tomography (CT) scan

Cohort 1 Pilot-WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Preliminary pilot assessment to confirm feasibility \& improved diagnostic accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET scan procedures, as compared to the regular medical care procedure, 99mTc MDP bone scans.

Intervention: 18F-Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF)

Cohort 1 Pilot-WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Preliminary pilot assessment to confirm feasibility \& improved diagnostic accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET scan procedures, as compared to the regular medical care procedure, 99mTc MDP bone scans.

Intervention: Gadopentetate dimeglumine

Cohort 2 WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Assessment to define the accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET/CT scan procedures compared to 99mTc MDP bone scan.

Intervention: Bone scan

Cohort 2 WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Assessment to define the accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET/CT scan procedures compared to 99mTc MDP bone scan.

Intervention: 99mTc-methyl diphosphonate

Cohort 2 WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Assessment to define the accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET/CT scan procedures compared to 99mTc MDP bone scan.

Intervention: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan

Cohort 3 Combined 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/WB-MRI scan

Assessment to define the utility of 18F-NaF \& 18F-FDG as the radiolabels in a single combined PET / WB-MRI procedure.

Intervention: 99mTc-methyl diphosphonate

Cohort 2 WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Assessment to define the accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET/CT scan procedures compared to 99mTc MDP bone scan.

Intervention: 18F-Fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)

Cohort 2 WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Assessment to define the accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET/CT scan procedures compared to 99mTc MDP bone scan.

Intervention: Computed Tomography (CT) scan

Cohort 2 WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Assessment to define the accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET/CT scan procedures compared to 99mTc MDP bone scan.

Intervention: 18F-Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF)

Cohort 2 WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Assessment to define the accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET/CT scan procedures compared to 99mTc MDP bone scan.

Intervention: Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WB-MRI) scan

Cohort 2 WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Assessment to define the accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET/CT scan procedures compared to 99mTc MDP bone scan.

Intervention: Gadofosveset

Cohort 2 WB-MRI & Combined 18F-NaF-CT/18F-FDG-PET scans

Assessment to define the accuracy of the combined 18F-NaF CT \& 18F-FDG PET/CT scan procedures compared to 99mTc MDP bone scan.

Intervention: Gadobutrol

Cohort 3 Combined 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/WB-MRI scan

Assessment to define the utility of 18F-NaF \& 18F-FDG as the radiolabels in a single combined PET / WB-MRI procedure.

Intervention: Bone scan

Cohort 3 Combined 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/WB-MRI scan

Assessment to define the utility of 18F-NaF \& 18F-FDG as the radiolabels in a single combined PET / WB-MRI procedure.

Intervention: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan

Cohort 3 Combined 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/WB-MRI scan

Assessment to define the utility of 18F-NaF \& 18F-FDG as the radiolabels in a single combined PET / WB-MRI procedure.

Intervention: 18F-Fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)

Cohort 3 Combined 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/WB-MRI scan

Assessment to define the utility of 18F-NaF \& 18F-FDG as the radiolabels in a single combined PET / WB-MRI procedure.

Intervention: 18F-Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF)

Cohort 3 Combined 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/WB-MRI scan

Assessment to define the utility of 18F-NaF \& 18F-FDG as the radiolabels in a single combined PET / WB-MRI procedure.

Intervention: Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WB-MRI) scan

Cohort 3 Combined 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/WB-MRI scan

Assessment to define the utility of 18F-NaF \& 18F-FDG as the radiolabels in a single combined PET / WB-MRI procedure.

Intervention: Gadofosveset

Cohort 3 Combined 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/WB-MRI scan

Assessment to define the utility of 18F-NaF \& 18F-FDG as the radiolabels in a single combined PET / WB-MRI procedure.

Intervention: Gadobutrol

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Cohort 1 - NaF PET/CT vs 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy

Time Frame: 30 days

The medical value of 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PET/CT) vs 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy was assessed on the basis of the radiation oncologist's medical assessment of image quality and detected extent of disease, for each participant. Per protocol, the data were collected and the outcome is reported for Cohort 1 only. The outcome is reported as the number of participants for whom the medical value of the image was superior for 18F-NaF vs 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy ("18F-NaF \> 99mTc-MDP"), the same between both scans ("18F-NaF = 99mTc-MDP"), or inferior for 18F-NaF vs 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy ("18F-NaF \< 99mTc-MDP").

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cohort 1 - Whole-body MRI vs 18F-NaF PET/CT(30 days)
  • Cohort 1 - Detection of Osseous (Skeletal) Metastases by 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT(30 days)
  • Cohort 1 - Whole-body MRI vs 18F-FDG PET/CT(30 days)
  • Cohort 2 - 18F-NaF/18F-FDG vs Whole-body MRI for Detection of Skeletal Lesions(30 days)
  • Cohort 2 - 18F-NaF/18F-FDG vs 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy for Detection of Skeletal Lesions(30 days)
  • Cohort 3 - Total Skeletal Lesions Identified, Tc-99m MDP WBBS vs 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/MRI(30 days)
  • Cohort 1 - 18F-NaF PET/CT vs 18F-FDG PET/CT(30 days)
  • Cohort 2 - Overall Sensitivity and Accuracy for 18F-NaF/18F-FDG vs Whole-body MRI(30 days)
  • Cohort 2 - 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT vs Whole-body MRI for Detection of Extraskeletal Lesions(30 days)
  • Cohort 2 - Overall Sensitivity and Accuracy for 18F-NaF/18F-FDG vs Whole-body MRI/99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy(30 days)
  • Cohort 3 - Skeletal Lesions Identified by 99mTc MDP WBBS vs 18F-NaF / 18F-FDG PET/MRI(30 days)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials