The hysteroscopic morcellator versus the bipolar resectoscope for removal of residual placental tissue: a randomized controlled trial.
Completed
- Conditions
- remainders of the afterbirth in the wombresidual placental tissue1003512910046828
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON38083
- Lead Sponsor
- Catharina-ziekenhuis
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 37
Inclusion Criteria
Patients with residual placental tissue as seen by ambulant diagnostic hysteroscopy who are planned for hysteroscopic surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with:
• Visual or pathological (e.g. on biopsy) evidence of malignancy
preoperatively or at the time of operation.
• Untreated cervical stenosis making safe access for operative hysteroscopy
impossible as diagnosed preoperatively or at the time of operation.
• A contra-indication for operative hysteroscopy.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Installation and operating time.<br /><br>Performing a second look hysteroscopy after 6 weeks checking for intrauterine<br /><br>adhesions, comparing the 2 techniques.</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Comparing data on peri- and post operative complications (e.g. fluid deficit,<br /><br>conversion rates, perforation, burns, postoperative infection), availability of<br /><br>tissue for pathology analysis and pathology results, and efficiency at 6 weeks<br /><br>follow-up. </p><br>