Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/2024-518724-72-00
2024-518724-72-00
Recruiting
Phase 4

PROgnostic value of precision medicine in patients with Myocardial Infarction and non-obStructive coronary artEries: the PROMISE study

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS4 sites in 1 country145 target enrollmentNovember 26, 2024

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Enrollment
145
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Angina status and quality of life (evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]) at 1-year follow-up in patients with MINOCA
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

To test if a precision-medicine approach with a careful investigation of the MINOCA aetiology and consequent aetiology-based treatment may result in improved quality of life outcomes.

Registry
euclinicaltrials.eu
Start Date
November 26, 2024
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Rocco Antonio Montone

Scientific

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Ability to give informed consent to the study
  • MINOCA diagnosis, defined as: - Acute myocardial infarction (based on Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Criteria): - Evidence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography (i.e., no coronary artery stenosis >50%) in any major epicardial vessel. - No specific alternate diagnosis for the clinical presentation (i.e. non-ischemic causes of myocardial injury such as sepsis, pulmonary embolism, and myocarditis).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability or limited capacity to give informed consent to the study
  • Pregnant and breast-feeding women or patients considering becoming pregnant during the study period will be excluded. For women of childbearing potential, the use of a highly effective contraceptive measure is required in order to be included in the study. “Highly effective contraceptive” is defined in accordance with the recommendations of the Clinical Trial Facilitation Group as a contraceptive measure with a failure rate of less than 1% per year (http://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01About_HMA/Working_Groups/CTFG/2014_09_HMA_CTFG_Contraception.pdf).
  • Alternate diagnosis for the clinical presentation (i.e. non-ischemic causes of myocardial injury such as sepsis, pulmonary embolism, valve disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and myocarditis). Also patients presenting with Takotsubo syndrome will be excluded
  • Contraindication to contrast-enhanced CMR, eg, severe renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min), non–CMR-compatible pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Contraindication to drugs administrated: e.g a history of hypersensitivity to drugs administrated or its excipients, significant renal and/or hepatic disease
  • Patients with comorbidities having an expected survival <1-year will be excluded

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Angina status and quality of life (evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]) at 1-year follow-up in patients with MINOCA

Angina status and quality of life (evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]) at 1-year follow-up in patients with MINOCA

Secondary Outcomes

  • Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of all-cause mortality; re-hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure; repeated coronary angiography) at 1-year follow-up in MINOCA patients
  • Healthcare primary and secondary related-costs (including costs for tests, procedures and outpatient visits or medicines) and socioeconomic burden of MINOCA patients
  • Ability of different circulating biomarkers (ET-1, NPY, CRP, sCD40L and miRNA [miR-16, miR-26a, miR-145, miR-222, miR-155-5p, miR-483-5p and miR-451]) as diagnostic biomarker and stratification tool for specific causes of MINOCA
  • Ability of CMR in evaluating different mechanisms of MINOCA and their prognostic value

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Active, not recruiting
Phase 4
Prognostic Value of Precision Medicine in Patients With MINOCA (PROMISE Trial).Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries
NCT05122780Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS120
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Diagnostic performance and prognostic significance of myocardial pathological findings in cardiomyopathycardiomyopathy
JPRN-UMIN000041174Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University900
Completed
Not Applicable
Prognostic parameter in patients having therapy&#45;related myeloid neoplasms after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRLT) over 20 years’ experiencetherapy&#45related myeloid neoplasmpeptide receptor radionuclide therapyrelated myeloid neoplasm&#44prognostic factor&#44peptide receptor radionuclide therapy&#44overall survival&#44predictor&#44myelodysplastic syndrome
TCTR20200428005one386
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Verification of therapeutic effects and prognosis by mesenchymal stem cell therapy in regenerative medicine and neuro rehabilitation for stroke patients
JPRN-UMIN000050323Fukunagakinen Clinic30
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Accuracy of Clinical Prediction Score for Serious Intracranial Causes of Acute Non&#45;Traumatic Headache in Emergency DepartmentSerious intracranial causesClinical Prediction Score&#44Serious Intracranial Cause&#44Acute Non&#45Traumatic Headache&#44Emergency Department
TCTR20200409009none511