Comparison of Abutments Engagement Configurations in Implant Supported Fixed Partial Dentures
- Conditions
- Dental Implant
- Registration Number
- NCT06715722
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Jordan
- Brief Summary
This study focuses on the comparison of different implant abutment connections configurations in implant supported screw retained fixed dental prostheses assessing their clinical and radiographic outcomes and to evaluate which implant abutment connection configuration have less biological and technical complications.
- Detailed Description
Study design:
This study is designed as a parallel group randomized controlled trial with an allocation ratio of 1:1.
The (PICO) study design: population will be patients from Jordan University Hospital aged 18 years or older, patients who will receive 2 internal connection dental implants to replace 3 posterior missing teeth in the mandible with a 3 unit screw-retained FDP with sufficient bone volume and controlled oral hygiene. The intervention group will receive a screw-retained FDP with conical engaging and non engaging abutment configuration, while the comparator group will a screw-retained FDP with both conical non engaging abutment configuration. The primary outcome is changes in marginal bone levels, and the secondary outcomes include technical and mechanical complications, biological complications, and patient satisfaction.
Both groups will receive 2 internal connection implants in the posterior mandible in healed sites of at least 3 months (guided implant surgery). The surgical procedure will follow standardized protocols, with no variations between groups other than the types of implant abutment connections used.
Blinded assessors will perform radiographic and clinical evaluations at designated follow-up visits: definitive loading, after 6 months of loading, after 2 years loading.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
- Adult patients with edentulous span in the posterior mandible of 3 missing teeth.
- Candidates for an implant supported FDP in the posterior mandible.
- Teeth in area of interest extracted at least 3 months prior.
- Bone grafting not needed or only minor GBR needed.
- Controlled oral hygiene.
- Sufficient bone volume.
- Patients with edentulous span of less than 3 missing teeth (not eligible to receive a 3 unit 2 implant supported FDP)
- Patients with healing period of extraction sites less than 3 months.
- Extensive bone grafting required prior to or during implant placement.
- Active Bruxism.
- Heavy smoker (> 10 cigarettes).
- Systemic diseases that might affect bone healing.
- Patients who are not willing or unable to give consent.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Marginal Bone Loss Baseline (day of definitive loading) and at 1-year follow-up post-loading. Marginal bone level changes by standardized periapical radiographs.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Technical or mechanical complications 1 year screw loosening, screw fracture, abutment or implant fracture, prosthesis fracture or chipping
Biological complications 1 year Peri implant bone loss, early implant failure.
Patient satisfaction 1 year To be assesses by oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14), The scale includes 14 items covering various aspects of oral health-related quality of life, Score Range: from 0 to 56, Higher OHIP-14 scores indicate a worse outcome, representing a greater negative impact of oral health issues on quality of life, while lower scores suggest a better outcome or less impact on the individual's daily life.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Jordan University Hospital
🇯🇴Amman, Jordan