跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06759662
NCT06759662尚未招募不适用

Association of Neutrophil- Lymphocyte Count Ratio and Microbial Infection in Hospitalized Patients

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2025年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
120
主要终点
neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio

研究概览

简要总结

Microbial infection is one of leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Bacteremia that result from microbial infection has mortality rate as high as 30% . Systemic infections that result from microbial infection is a generalized disease that progresses rapidly and can lead to high mortality. This infection sets in from a progression of various pathogenic microorganisms that enter the bloodstream, reproduce and then release toxins and metabolites . Early diagnosis of microbial infection is essential for treatment. Culturing microorganisms is the most definitive way to confirm bacterial infections. Unfortunately, this gold standard is time consuming and may take from 24 to 48 hours and sometimes up to a week. A number of rapid initial indicators of microbial infection have been proposed, including C-reactive protein, neutrophil count, and white blood cell count. However, these criteria do not always reliably distinguish between severe bacterial, fungal, and viral infections . Therefore, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLCR), a simple ratio between the number of neutrophils and lymphocytes measured in peripheral blood, has been proposed as a biomarker that combines two aspects of the immune system: the innate immune response, which is mainly driven by neutrophils, and adaptive immunity, supported by lymphocytes . This study aims to determine the diagnostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLCR) as an indicator of microbial infection, using complete blood count to determine the ratio in addition to culture and sensitivity according to the site of infection.

the aim of this study is to Investigating the association between neutrophil-lymphocyte count and the presence of microbial infection in the hospitalized patients.

详细描述

Microbial infection is one of leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Bacteremia that result from microbial infection has mortality rate as high as 30% . Systemic infections that result from microbial infection is a generalized disease that progresses rapidly and can lead to high mortality. This infection sets in from a progression of various pathogenic microorganisms that enter the bloodstream, reproduce and then release toxins and metabolites . Early diagnosis of microbial infection is essential for treatment. Culturing microorganisms is the most definitive way to confirm bacterial infections. Unfortunately, this gold standard is time consuming and may take from 24 to 48 hours and sometimes up to a week. A number of rapid initial indicators of microbial infection have been proposed, including C-reactive protein, neutrophil count, and white blood cell count. However, these criteria do not always reliably distinguish between severe bacterial, fungal, and viral infections . Therefore, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLCR), a simple ratio between the number of neutrophils and lymphocytes measured in peripheral blood, has been proposed as a biomarker that combines two aspects of the immune system: the innate immune response, which is mainly driven by neutrophils, and adaptive immunity, supported by lymphocytes . This study aims to determine the diagnostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLCR) as an indicator of microbial infection, using complete blood count to determine the ratio in addition to culture and sensitivity according to the site of infection.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • age more than 18 years old
  • conformed diagnosis with micorbial infection

排除标准

  • Immunodeficiency patients

结局指标

主要结局

neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio

时间窗: baseline

neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio in the hospitalized patients with microbial infection

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Asmaa Hamed Abdelwahed Mohamed

residant doctor at Assiut university hospital

Assiut University

相似试验