Effect on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease With Advanced Fibrosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Treatment With Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide / Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Analogue (Tirzpatide)
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- change in liver stiffness in terms of kPa
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Obesity and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus prevalence has doubled in the last 30 years and nearly one fifth of UAE population has Type 2 Diabetes while more than quarter has obesity.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is present in more than 30% of patients with type 2 diabetes and in > 50% patient with obesity
20% of patients with Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease progress to develop non-alcoholic steatohepatitis which can lead to liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma.
This study aims to use GLP-1 analogue to see effects on liver fat deposition after six months of treatment
There is no current randomised study on treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in United Arab Emirates population; so once completed this will the first study.
This study will pave the way for developing a treatment pathway for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Detailed Description
Background:
Over the past few decades Non-Alcoholic Fatty liver disease (NAFLD) related non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis has overtaken all other causes of liver cirrhosis in the developed world, secondary to the rising epidemic of obesity and type 2 Diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of NAFL is estimated at 30% in developed work and nearly one fifth of them NFALD will progress to NASH, 20% of which will develop liver cirrhosis subsequently leading to liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Annual medical costs directly attributed to NAFLD exceed €35 billion in top European countries (United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy) and over $100 billion in the United States, while cost of this in unknown in Middle East. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as fatty infiltration of the liver not related to alcohol excess or other usual causes of hepatic steatosis (e.g. viral or autoimmune hepatitis or secondary to medications) and includes a spectrum ranging from steatosis, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis to cirrhosis; it is now the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Although most patients with NAFLD may not progress to advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, due to the high prevalence the number of patients develop cirrhosis is still high and is now a leading indication for liver transplantation in Europe. Global prevalence data for NAFLD suggest that the, Midlle East region has one of the highest prevalence rate of up to 32%.Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an important risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with recent metanalysis showing that the global prevalence of NAFLD among patients with T2DM to be around 55.5% with no specific available data for Emirati population with respects to NAFLD in T2DM patients. Obesity is another well-known risk factor and there is high prevalence of NAFLD in obese patients, with up to 65% of people with grade I-II obesity (BMI = 30-39.9 kg/m2) and in 85% of patients with grade III obesity (BMI = 40-59 kg/m2) having NAFLD.
United Arab Emirates (UAE) has one of the highest prevalence of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the world with 16.4% of adult population diagnosed with this condition as per International Diabetes federation. UAE also has the highest prevalence of obesity, doubled from 1989 to 2017, currently ranking among the top 40 countries in the world with estimated prevalence rate of 31.7%, using body mass index (BMI) cut-off of 30 kg/m2. This rate will be substantially higher if newer definition of ethnicity specific BMI cut off for obesity (i.e. > 25 kg/m2 being obese) is used, which is more relevant for Asian population. The presence of both these conditions means UAE is likely to have very high prevalence of NAFLD in patients having both diabetes and obesity.
The gold standard test for identifying NALFD and Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a liver biopsy. However, liver biopsy is an invasive procedure and is associated with complications. A non-invasive method using Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) utilizing FibroScan provides a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) expressed in kilopascals (kPa) which correlate with fibrosis advanced stages like F3 (bridging fibrosis) with LSM of 9.9-13.9 KPa and F4 (advanced scarring or cirrhosis) quite well and has emerged as an alternative to invasive liver biopsy. Other non-invasive tools used to detect the presence of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD include clinical/biochemical scoring systems like NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) and FIB-4 index, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI), Enhanced Liver Fibrosis panel, Hepascore; and imaging techniques like VCTE or magnetic resonance elastography(MRE). The NFS is based on six clinical/biochemical variables including age, presence of impaired fasting glucose or Diabetes, Body Mass Index (BMI), platelet count, albumin and AST/ALT (alanine aminotransferase) ratio. A recent large meta-analysis, showed that NFS had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.85 for predicting advanced fibrosis stages like F3 (bridging fibrosis) and F4 (advanced scarring or cirrhosis) with a score of 0.676 or more having 67% sensitivity and 97% specificity to identify the presence of advanced fibrosis. A recent study that compared various risk scores and elastography (including MRE and VCTE) versus liver histology to identify NAFLD fibrosis showed that NFS were better than other indices such as BARD, APRI, and AST/ALT ratio; and found to be as good as MRE and and FIB-4 for predicting advanced fibrosis in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Recent guidelines therefore recommend NFS as a clinically useful tool for identifying patients with NAFLD with a higher likelihood of having advanced fibrosis (F3 or F4).
Currently various treatments have been used for NALFD. The current guidelines from American Association for study of liver diseases suggests that Pioglitazone can improve histological appearance in patient with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and NASH while Vitamin E may offer benefit in non-diabetic population, while GLP-1 Analgoues like liraglutide could be beneficial however there is not enough evidence for it to be used routinely for patients with NASH.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Na
- Intervention Model
- Single Group
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age > 18; either male or female
- •Diagnosed to have Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for > 1 year.
- •Presence of NAFLD advanced fibrosis (F3 and F4; defined by NFS of > 0.676)
- •Able to consent independently
- •Not already on GLP-1 analogues or SGLT2 inhibitors or pioglitazone
- •Good general health
- •BMI> 19 but less than 40
Exclusion Criteria
- •Known history of alcohol excess or current alcohol use of > 20 g/week
- •Evidence of pre-existing liver or biliary disease (hepatoma, biliary tract obstruction; liver cirrhosis secondary to viral infection or immune/ congenital).
- •Known or suspected hypersensitivity to GLP-1 analogues or pioglitazone.
- •Receipt of any investigational medicinal product within 30 days before screening.
- •Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of childbearing potential and not using highly effective contraceptive methods.
- •Endocrinopathies (e.g., Cushing syndrome)
- •Personal history of heart disease especially heart failure
- •History of malignant neoplasm within 5 years prior to the day of screening. Basal and squamous cell skin cancer and any carcinoma in-situ is allowed.
- •eGFR < 30
- •history of heamturia or bladder cancer
- •history of osteoporosis
- •ALT ≥3.5 times the upper normal limit (UNL)
- •Taking steroids, antipsychotics or progesterone preparations
- •Uncontrolled hypertension
- •Positive insulinoma associated-protein 2 (IA-2) antibodies or anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (anti-GAD) antibodies.
- •HbA1c > 10%
- •Claustrophobia or unable to get MRI due to contraindications (e.g metal in the body)
- •Weight > 150 kg (due to imaging trolley restrictions)
Arms & Interventions
GLP-1/GIP Arm pre and post intervention
The adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending Tawam Hospital Diabetes clinic, who are identified as having fatty liver disease either via ultrasound or biochemical parameter of NFS.
We will aim to include minimum 30 patients fulfilling the selection criteria as below. Informed written consent will be obtained . Intervention group will receive GLP-1 analogues (subcutaneous Tirzepatide or oral semaglutide).
The blood tests will be done at baseline, 3 months of treatment and at 6 months of treatment. Liver imaging (fibroscan and/or MRI fat measurement) will be done at baseline and at 6 months to see if there is any change.The KPa improvement in liver stiffness and total fat estimation pre and post intervention in both groups will assessed
Intervention: GIP/GLP-1a (Drug)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
change in liver stiffness in terms of kPa
Time Frame: 12 months
To measure the liver stiffness pre and post GLP-1 analogue/GIP treatment for 6 months to assess any change in liver stiffness in terms of kPa in patient with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and NAFLD
Change in Liver fat quantification
Time Frame: 12 months
To measure the liver fat quantification via MRI proton density fraction, pre and post GLP-1 analogue/GIP treatment for 6 months to assess any change in total liver fat content in patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and NAFLD
Secondary Outcomes
- change in BMI(12 months)
- Glycaemic control(12 months)
Investigators
Dr Adnan Agha
Assistant Professor, Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University
United Arab Emirates University
