Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03581565
NCT03581565CompletedNot Applicable

Effect of Cementation Technique Applied for Single-tooth Implant Crowns on Residual Cement: A Three-arm Parallel-group Randomized Clinical Trial

Kıvanç Akça1 site in 1 country10 target enrollmentStarted: October 16, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
10
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
visual assessment of residual cement on crown-abutment complex

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Cement retention has been widely used for implant-supported fixed partial dentures in daily dental practice. The cementation approach indeed offers straightforward clinical application protocol which is basically conceptualized for tooth/teeth supported fixed restorations. However, removal of excess cement around implant restorations presents specific difficulties. More importantly, there are certain biological consequences due to residual cement leftover in peri-implant sulcus. There is no evidence based guidance with regards to cementation techniques applied for implant supported fixed restorations due to limited clinical studies. Therefore the aim of this clinical trial is to compare three different cementation technique with regards to removal of excess cement and other clinical subsidiaries (abutment margin, crown surface and contour) involving indirectly as well.

Detailed Description

Single-tooth implant crowns to replace missing molar tooth were addressed to qualify and quantify residual cement on implant-abutment complex and peri-implant soft tissue following cementation. Thirty bone-level dental implants of one kind enrolled in the study. Prior to delivery of screw-retained crowns completed for usual treatment, implants were allocated randomly to a trial comparison group. Three different cement loading approach, ten in each group, was applied using cement-retained trial crowns on prefabricated metal abutments. Following completion of the assigned cementation technique, the trial crown was removed with its abutment accessing from the occlusal hole prepared after removal of excess cement. Then, the presence of residual cement on implant-abutment complex and implant soft tissue in accordance with axial and proximal surfaces was qualified. To quantify the amount of residual cement in accordance with location and distribution, the crown-abutment complex was digitized three-dimensionally using an intra-oral scanner. The output of surface data was evaluated in virtual 3-D image for cement excess, when detected location in the abutment-crown complex is recorded, area and distribution was calculated using a software. The frequency of occurrence and quantity of residual cement of 3-different cementation techniques was statistically evaluated using logistic and linear regression model separately considering abutment margin, crown surface and contour.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •completed growth and development
  • •periodontally and dentally healthy conditions
  • •missing single molar tooth without free-end edentulism
  • •bone-level standard diameter of a specific implant from one manufacturer
  • •complication free healing period for osseointegration following straightforward surgical implant placement
  • •natural dentition or fixed restoration in dental arch
  • •signing of informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

  • •absolute systemic contraindications for implant surgery (e.g. bone cancer, radiation therapy)
  • •relative systemic contraindications for implant surgery (e.g. diabetes, steroid therapy)
  • •risk factors (e.g. smoking, limited mouth opening)

Arms & Interventions

Technique I

Active Comparator

Loading of a zinc polycarboxylate (with the requirements of ISO 9917) cement to fulfill the crown

Cement: Poly-F, DentsplySirona, York, Pennsylvania, United States Mixing Ratio: 1 scoop powder: 2 drops liquid Mixing Time (extraoral): 30 seconds Working Time (extraoral): 45 seconds Application (extraoral): placement of mixture into crown using a heidemann Spatula Setting Time (intraoral): 2-8 minutes

Intervention: zinc polycarboxylate (with the requirements of ISO 9917) (Other)

Technique II

Active Comparator

Loading of a zinc polycarboxylate (with the requirements of ISO 9917) to fill the coronal half of the crown

Cement: Poly-F, DentsplySirona, York, Pennsylvania, United States Mixing Ratio: 1 scoop powder: 2 drops liquid Mixing Time (extraoral): 30 seconds Working Time (extraoral): 45 seconds Application (extraoral): placement of mixture into crown using a heidemann Spatula Setting Time (intraoral): 2-8 minutes

Intervention: zinc polycarboxylate (with the requirements of ISO 9917) (Other)

Technique III

Active Comparator

Application of a zinc polycarboxylate (with the requirements of ISO 9917) to the axial walls of internal surface of crown

Cement: Poly-F, DentsplySirona, York, Pennsylvania, United States Mixing Ratio: 1 scoop powder: 2 drops liquid Mixing Time (extraoral): 30 seconds Working Time (extraoral): 45 seconds Application (extraoral): application of mixture into crown using a bonding applicator tip Setting Time (intraoral): 2-8 minutes

Intervention: zinc polycarboxylate (with the requirements of ISO 9917) (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

visual assessment of residual cement on crown-abutment complex

Time Frame: 15 minutes

removal of cemented crown-abutment complex to detect excess cement on the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of crown and abutment separately scoring: presence or absence

measurement of residual cement area and distribution

Time Frame: 30 minutes

digitalization of the removed crown-abutment complexes those scored with cement presence, then using a software, virtual selection of existing cement to calculate the area in millimeter square and to define the direction and the extension in millimeters on the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of crown and abutment separately

Secondary Outcomes

  • visual assessment of residual cement around the peri-implant soft tissue(15 minutes)

Investigators

Sponsor
Kıvanç Akça
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Kıvanç Akça

Prof. Dr.

Hacettepe University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials