Evaluation of Programs of Reeducation for Urinary Incontinence in Woman
Not Applicable
Terminated
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence
- Registration Number
- NCT02899520
- Lead Sponsor
- Hopital Foch
- Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare two methods of pelvic floor muscle training: reference method versus CMP ® method ( (Connaissance et Maîtrise de Périnée : Knowledge and Control of Perineum)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients more than 18 years old and less than 75 years
- Patients presenting an urinary incontinence of effort or mixed symptomatic associated with a pelvic statics disorder
- Patients with a perineale reeducation prescription
- Patients affiliated to a national insurance scheme or benefiting from such a program
- Patients having given her written consent form
Exclusion Criteria
- Nulliparous woman
- Patients already operated for their incontinence
- Patients with a prolapse of higher level at the stage II of the classification POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification)
- Pregnant women
- Patients presenting an associated anal incontinence,
- Patients presenting a cancellation (section of marrow, syringomyelia for example) or an inversion of perineum control
- Patients having given birth less than 6 months before the care
- Patients having benefited from a pelvi-périnéale reeducation in the previous 12 months,
- Patients presenting psychiatric disease
- Patients presenting a vaginismus,
- Patients presenting a contraindication to the practice of the electrostimulation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method USP (Urinary Symptoms Profile) score 38 weeks Urinary Symptoms Profile score
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie pelvic floor muscle training for stress urinary incontinence?
How does the CMP® method compare to standard pelvic floor exercises in improving bladder control outcomes?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict response to perineal reeducation in female urinary incontinence patients?
What adverse events are associated with perineal muscle training programs and how are they managed?
What combination therapies show promise with pelvic floor rehabilitation for mixed urinary incontinence treatment?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hopital Foch
🇫🇷Suresnes, France
Hopital Foch🇫🇷Suresnes, France