Evaluation of Programs of Reeducation for Urinary Incontinence in Woman

Hopital Foch1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentNovember 10, 2014

ConditionsUrinary Incontinence

Overview

Phase: N/A
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Urinary Incontinence
Sponsor: Hopital Foch
Enrollment: 60
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: USP (Urinary Symptoms Profile) score
Status: Terminated
Last Updated: 6 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare two methods of pelvic floor muscle training: reference method versus CMP ® method ( (Connaissance et Maîtrise de Périnée : Knowledge and Control of Perineum)

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

November 10, 2014

End Date

October 18, 2019

Last Updated

6 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Parallel

Sex

Female

Investigators

Sponsor

Hopital Foch

Responsible Party

Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•Patients more than 18 years old and less than 75 years
•Patients presenting an urinary incontinence of effort or mixed symptomatic associated with a pelvic statics disorder
•Patients with a perineale reeducation prescription
•Patients affiliated to a national insurance scheme or benefiting from such a program
•Patients having given her written consent form

Exclusion Criteria

•Nulliparous woman
•Patients already operated for their incontinence
•Patients with a prolapse of higher level at the stage II of the classification POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification)
•Pregnant women
•Patients presenting an associated anal incontinence,
•Patients presenting a cancellation (section of marrow, syringomyelia for example) or an inversion of perineum control
•Patients having given birth less than 6 months before the care
•Patients having benefited from a pelvi-périnéale reeducation in the previous 12 months,
•Patients presenting psychiatric disease
•Patients presenting a vaginismus,