Compression Is Life In Cardiac Arrest - Quality Study (CILICA-QS)
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest
- Interventions
- Device: CPRmeter (feedback device) with feedbackDevice: CPRmeter (feedback device) without feedback
- Registration Number
- NCT03140202
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Caen
- Brief Summary
Context: Chest compressions quality is known to be essential in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Despite a known harmful effect of chest compressions interruptions, current guidelines still recommend provider switch every 2 minutes. Feedback impact on chest compressions quality preservation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation remains to be assessed.
Study design: simulated prospective monocentric randomized crossover trial.
Participants and methods: Sixty five professionals rescuers of the pre-hospital care unit of University Hospital of Caen (doctors, nurses and ambulance drivers) are enrolled to performed continuous chest compression on manikin (ResusciAnne®, Laerdal), twice, with and without a feedback device (CPRmeter®). Correct compression score (the main criterion) is defined by reached target of rate, depth and leaning at the same time (recorded continuously).
Hypothesis: Feedback device preserve chest compression quality above the 2 minutes recommended switch over during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 65
- Operational staff of University hospital of Caen pre-hospital unit
- Ability in CardioPulmonary Resuscitation
- medical contraindication
- refusal
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Guide then blind CPRmeter (feedback device) with feedback This group use the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen visible) first, then have no access to the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen mask). Blind then guide CPRmeter (feedback device) with feedback This group have no access to the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen mask) first then use the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen visible). Guide then blind CPRmeter (feedback device) without feedback This group use the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen visible) first, then have no access to the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen mask). Blind then guide CPRmeter (feedback device) without feedback This group have no access to the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen mask) first then use the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen visible).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Correct compression score Day 0 Correct compression score is defined by reached target of rate (between 100/min and 120/min), depth (between 50 mm and 60 mm) and leaning (less than 2500g) at the same time
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Decrease time of 30% of correct compression score Day 0 Time at witch correct compression score decrease of 30% of the reference correct compression score (first 20 secondes)
Chest compression depth Day 0 Chest compression depth reached (in mm)
Percentage of chest compression without leaning Day 0 Percentage of chest compression without leaning defined with a residual weight egal or above 2500 g
Percentage of correct chest compression rate Day 0 Percentage chest compression rate between 100/min and 120/min
Participants' fatigue (Borg's scale) Day 0 Participant auto-evaluation of fatigue with a predefined scale from 6 to 20 (no unit).
Chest compression rate Day 0 Chest compression rate per min
Percentage of chest compression with correct depth Day 0 Percentage of chest compression with depth between 50 mm and 60 mm
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Hospital of Caen
🇫🇷Caen, Normandy, France