A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of a Chrocare Large Model-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Integrated Management of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

This trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial conducted in about 40 MMC (Metabolic Management Center) hospitals across China, enrolling 1200 adult patients aged ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus, baseline HbA1c 7.0%-9.0%, combined with mild-to-moderate diabetic nephropathy (UACR 3.39-33.9 mg/mmol) or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Subjects will be assigned 1:1 via central stratified randomization to the Chrocare AI clinical decision support system intervention group or routine physician care control group. The double-blind design separates physicians into two independent roles: one clinician interacts with patients and performs follow-up, another clinician generates treatment plans without direct patient contact, masking group allocation throughout the trial period. The Chrocare large language model automatically extracts multi-dimensional clinical data from hospital EHR, LIS and imaging systems, and generates individualized hypoglycemic, hypotensive and lipid-lowering regimens complying with domestic and international diabetes guidelines, alongside risk assessment of diabetic microvascular complications. The control group's treatment plans are developed by a panel of attending endocrinologists with more than 5 years of clinical experience through double independent review. All participants will undergo fixed visits at baseline, month 3 and month 6. Collected indicators include glycated hemoglobin, fasting and postprandial blood glucose, blood pressure, BMI, visceral fat, blood lipid profile, liver and renal function, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, and retinal grading. All hypoglycemia, cardiovascular events, hospitalizations and other adverse events will be fully documented for safety evaluation. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c less than 7.0% at month 6. Secondary endpoints include changes in metabolic indicators, improvement of microvascular complications, guideline adherence rate of treatment plans, and incidence of inappropriate medication. Safety endpoints cover all adverse events and serious adverse events during the 6-month follow-up. Statistical analyses will be performed on the full analysis set, per-protocol set and safety set using SAS, SPSS and R software, with mixed-effect logistic regression and generalized estimating equations applied for between-group comparisons. This study is initiated and sponsored by the Principal Investigator from Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and has obtained ethical approval from the institutional ethics committee prior to participant enrollment.