BENdamustine at Elevated Dose for Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma in Intensification Therapy and Transplantation (BENEFIT)
- Conditions
- Follicular Lymphoma
- Interventions
- Drug: BeEAM
- Registration Number
- NCT02008006
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Leon Berard
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) regimen prior to autologous stem cell transplant for first and second chemosensitive relapses in patients with follicular lymphoma (World Health Organisation (WHO) grade 1, 2, 3a).
- Detailed Description
The natural history of this follicular lymphoma (FL) is marked by multiple relapses. The prognosis of FL has improved with the use of effective sequential chemotherapy and the introduction of anti-cluster of differentiation antigen 20 (anti-CD20) monoclonal antibody. Based on the multiple phases II, high dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) appear to be an effective treatment in relapsed FL. At rituximab era, the 3-years EFS rate was 75% for relapsed transplanted patients treated in first line therapy in FL2000 protocol. Bendamustine that combines alkylating and antimetabolite activities had proven clinical activity in relapse and in first line therapy of FL. Carmustine (BCNU), etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM regimen) is one of the most used schedule of HDT in non hodgkin lymphoma. Regarding the good safety profile of Bendamustine, Visani et al. proposed a phase I/II of bendamustine at day -7 and -6, followed by etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan with similar dose than BEAM regimen. The bendamustine maximal dose is 200 mg/m² day -7, -6. Data from engraftment showed closed results than those observed after BEAM. None of patients experienced a dose limiting toxicity. In this context, the investigators proposed to perform a multicentric phase II of this regimen with 200 mg/m² day-7 and -6 of bendamustine for first and second relapsed FL with a chemosensitive disease after salvage therapy. No FL was evaluated in Visani et al. study. In addition, the investigators can observe a shortage of the BCNU these last years that incline to evaluate new schedule of HDT.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 21
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description BeEAM BeEAM High Dose Chemotherapy (HDT) containing : * Bendamustine * Etoposide * Cytarabine * Melphalan HDT will be followed by an Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Event Free Survival rate (EFS) Evaluated by the time from inclusion to the time of event appearance with a time of observation of 2 years after inclusion EFS will be measured from the date of inclusion to the date of event defined as : death due to any cause, relapse/progression, or changes in therapies. Patients with no event at the time of analysis will be censored at the date of the last contact
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Safety profile of BeEAM Evaluated all along the 4 years study follow up for each patient The safety analyzable population include all patients who received at least one dose of BeEAM regimen
Overall Response Rate (ORR) according to Cheson at al. 2007 Evaluated at day 100 after graft ORR is defined by the rate of patients in Complete Response (CR) and in Partial Response (PR) at time of evaluation.
ORR is assessed according to Cheson et al. 2007 criteriaOverall Response Rate (ORR) according to Cheson et al. 1999 Evaluated at day 100 after graft ORR is defined by the rate of patients in Complete Response (CR) and in Partial Response (PR) at time of evaluation.
ORR assessed according to Cheson et al. 1999 criteriaOverall Survival (OS) Evaluated by the time from inclusion to the time of death with a study duration of 5 years maximum OS will be measured from the date of inclusion to the date of death due to any cause and will be censored at the date of last contact for the patients alive at last contact
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Evaluated by the time from inclusion to the time of progression with a study duration of 5 years maximum PFS will be measured from the date of inclusion to the date of event defined as : progression/relapse or death due to any cause. Patients with no event at the time of analysis will be censored at the date of the last contact.
PFS will be assessed among all included patients and in the subgroup of complete responders at the beginning of HDT.
Trial Locations
- Locations (13)
CHU de Dijon - Hôpital Le Bocage
🇫🇷Dijon, Côte d'Or, France
Centre Henri Becquerel
🇫🇷Rouen, Haute Normandie, France
CHRU de Montpellier, Hôpital Saint-Eloi
🇫🇷Montpellier, Hérault, France
APHP Hôpital Necker
🇫🇷Paris, Ile De France, France
AP-HP Hôpital Saint-Louis
🇫🇷Paris, Ile-de-France, France
CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou
🇫🇷Rennes, Ille Et Vilaine, France
CHU Grenoble - Hôpital Michallon
🇫🇷Grenoble, Isère, France
CHU de Nantes Hôtel Dieu
🇫🇷Nantes, Loire Atlantique, France
CHU de Nancy
🇫🇷Vandoeuvre Lès Nancy, Meurthe Et Moselle, France
CHRU de Lille Hôpital Claude Huriez
🇫🇷Lille, Nord Pas De Calais, France
Scroll for more (3 remaining)CHU de Dijon - Hôpital Le Bocage🇫🇷Dijon, Côte d'Or, France