MedPath

Precision-Based Approach to Matching Evidence-Based Interventions to Students With Externalizing Behaviors

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Problem;Behaviour;Child
Interventions
Behavioral: Student Intervention Matching System (SIMS)
Behavioral: group-based social skills training
Registration Number
NCT05752942
Lead Sponsor
University of Iowa
Brief Summary

Although prevalent across schools in the US, the "One-Size-Fits-All" (OSFA) approach to selecting evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for student externalizing behaviors often yields lackluster outcomes, due to the mismatch between the EBI and students' heterogeneous needs. Emerging literature highlighted the promise of the precision approach to intervention (e.g., Student Intervention Matching System; SIMS), whereas EBIs were selected based on the match between a student's individual needs and the active components of EBIs. This pilot study tested the efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of SIMS to match EBIs to students with externalizing behaviors. The investigators ran a double-masked randomized waitlist-controlled trial in a diverse urban district. Students at risk for externalizing behaviors were recruited and randomly assigned to the treatment (EBIs matched via SIMS) or control condition (mismatched social-skill training). Students received EBIs based on assigned condition for 10 weeks. Students' externalizing behaviors were assessed via a multi-method approach at baseline and 10-week posttest. Teachers rated the feasibility and acceptability of SIMS at 10-week posttest. The investigators used cluster-adjusted ANCOVAs to compare efficacy of matched EBIs via SIMS against that of the mismatched social skill training in reducing student externalizing behaviors.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
51
Inclusion Criteria
  • with a moderate risk for externalizing behavioral problems, which was indicated by a score between 4 and 8 on the Student Risk Screening Scale-Externalizing.
  • receiving the majority of services in general education settings
  • in 3rd, 4th, or 5th grade level.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • severe risk for externalizing problems, which was indicated by a score exceeding 8 on the Student Risk Screening Scale-Externalizing. The students at severe risk will be referred to the school counselor for appropriate service.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Treatment: Student Intervention Matching SystemStudent Intervention Matching System (SIMS)In the treatment condition, the students received a performance-based interventions matched to their individual needs and characteristics based on Student Intervention Matching System (SIMS).
Active control: group-based social skills traininggroup-based social skills trainingIn the control condition, students received an unconditionally mismatched acquisition-based EBI (group-based social skills training).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in the frequency of students' externalizing behaviors from baseline to 10-week follow-upStart of the study (baseline) and End of the study (10-week posttest)

The Direct Behavior Rating- Multi-Item Scale (DBR-MIS) is a pragmatic and low-inference assessment of an operationally defined problem behavior on a specific dimension (frequency, intensity, or duration of externalizing behaviors; Christ et al., 2009). The educators complete the DBR-MIS based on their observations of the target student in the setting where the problem behavior usually occurs for a pre-specified period. The DBR-MIS contains three items corresponding to disruptive behaviors, aggressive behavior, and noncompliance, which were summed into a total score of externalizing behaviors. Each item was rated on a 10-point Likert scale ranging from "0%; Never" to "50%; Sometimes" to "100%; Always".

Change in the severity of students' externalizing behaviors from baseline to 10-week follow-upStart of the study (baseline), and End of the study (10-week posttest)

The Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scale (SSIS-RS; Elliott et al., 2008) is a brief and intervention-oriented assessment of students' needs in social skills and problem behaviors. Given the scope of this study, only the "externalizing behavior subscale" were used. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale (0= Never, 1= Seldom, 2 = Often, and 3= Almost Always) based on the frequency of a student's externalizing behavior. High scores indicate more frequent externalizing behaviors.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Feasibility and AcceptabilityEnd of the study (10-week posttest)

The school teams and designated implementers of matched EBIs rated the feasibility and acceptability of the EBIs matched via SIMS. Given the scope of this study, we used two subscales, Feasibility (7-item) and Acceptability (9-item), from the Usage Rating Profile-Intervention Revised (URP-IR; Chafouleas et al., 2011). All items were rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 "strongly disagree" to 6 "strongly agree".

Intervention FidelityEnd of the study (10-week posttest)

The designated implementers of matched EBIs (e.g., teachers, paraprofessionals, or behavioral specialists) used EBI-specific checklists to assess their intervention fidelity. Given the scope of this study and the common practice in school-based intervention research, we used implementers' adherence to the EBI protocols as the primary indicator of intervention fidelity. Fidelity checklists were developed by (a) operationalizing the core components of an EBI, and (b) having implementers to self-report how many core components they delivered as intended for the target student during a specific period.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath