Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01259414
NCT01259414CompletedPhase 3

Comparison of Two Solvents Used With Chemotherapy Agent for Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Sun Yat-sen University1 site in 1 country812 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2011Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
812
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
overall survival

Study Overview

Brief Summary

TACE is considered the standard treatment for unresectable HCC and is widely used as a palliative treatment. However there is no consensus of the protocol of TACE.One of the variation is does the stability of the suspension by emulsified the lipiodol and the contrast medium used to dissolve the anticancer agents really effect the survival.Thus the investigators conduct this prospective,randomized controlled study to find out if the different method of preparing chemotheraputic drugs can cause a different survival benefit.

Detailed Description

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is currently the mainstays of palliative treatments worldwide for patients with unresectable HCC. However there is no standard protocol exists for TACE currently. One of the controversy is does the way of emulsified the anticancer agents and lipiodol to get a high stability suspension really effect the survival rates.

Anticancer drugs play important role in survival benefit. Many studies have innovated different methods to get a high stability suspension of lipiodol and anticancer drugs ,because they think lipiodol can selectively retained in HCC and used as a drug-carrying which allow a slow release of the anticancer drug from lipiodol microdroplets. Thus ,A stability suspension might get a maximize tumor drug uptake,which can caused a more tumor necrosis, and minimize systemic drug levels ,which get a less toxicity, hence survival benefit. While the other researcher think a stability emulsion can't get a positive effect ,such as pharmacokinetic and systematic toxicity of the anticancer drugs, tumor response, biologic response and so on.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Male or female patients > 18 years and <=70 years of age with a diagnosis of HCC
  • •BCLC B stage disease
  • •Not amendable to surgical resection ,local ablative therapy and any other cured treatment.
  • •Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured according to EASL criteria. The lesion has not been previously treated with TACE, surgery, radiation therapy, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection, or cryoablation.
  • •No Cirrhosis or cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only
  • •Not pregnant or breast-feeding patients
  • •No significant renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/minute) or patients on dialysis
  • •The following laboratory parameters:
  • •Platelet count ≥ 60,000/µL
  • •Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL
  • •Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL Serum albumin ≥ 35 g/L
  • •ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal
  • •Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal
  • •INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits
  • •Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3
  • •Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Known history of HIV
  • •History of organ allograft
  • •Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
  • •Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
  • •Evidence of bleeding diathesis.
  • •Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
  • •Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event > CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
  • •Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
  • •Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease
  • •severe Arterioportal Shunts or Arteria vein Shunts

Arms & Interventions

group1

Experimental

Chemoembolization with solvent with specific gravity less than lipiodol

Intervention: Solvent with specific gravity less than lipiodol (Other)

group2

Experimental

Chemoembolization with Solvent with specific gravity equivalent to lipiodol

Intervention: Solvent with specific gravity equivalent to lipiodol (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

overall survival

Time Frame: 3 year

Secondary Outcomes

  • Time to progression(3 year)

Investigators

Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Shi Ming

Prof.

Sun Yat-sen University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials