跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03140007
NCT03140007Unknown不适用

Diagnostic Accuracy of ERCP-guided Versus Cholangioscopy-guided Tissue Acquisition in Patients With Indeterminate Biliary Strictures Suspected to be Intrinsic - a Randomized Controlled Study

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India0 个研究点目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2017年6月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
60
主要终点
Diagnostic accuracy of cholangioscopy or cholangiography

研究概览

简要总结

Primary Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of cholangioscopy-based assessment using SpyDS technology compared to cholangiography-based assessment using ERCP-guided biopsy and brushing in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures in the setting of cholangiocarcinoma.

详细描述

Study Design : Prospective,multi-center, randomized controlled, Post market Study (PMS)

Two groups:

  • Control arm - ERCP arm: ERCP impression and ERCP-guided brushing and biopsy
  • Study arm - Cholangioscopy arm: SpyDS impression and SpyDS-guided SpyBite biopsy Randomization 1:1 ratio. Primary Endpoint: Diagnostic accuracy of cholangioscopy or cholangiography assessed at 6 months after initial ERCP procedure
  • Malignancy will be determined by cytology or histology on tissue sampling during the index procedure, or from other tissue acquisition or surgical specimen histopathology up to 6 months after the index procedure.
  • Overall diagnostic accuracy.
  • The assessed strictures will be considered benign if there was no confirmation of malignancy by 6 months after the index procedure.
  • Overall diagnostic accuracy will be assessed for
  • ERCP impression of malignancy
  • ERCP-guided brushing and biopsies separately and combined*
  • SpyDS impression of malignancy
  • SpyBite biopsies
  • In case of discordant results, the following will be followed for the combined pathology/cytology measure:
  • If at least one is malignancy, then combine metric is malignant
  • If both are benign or one is benign and one is non-diagnostic, then combined metric is benign
  • If both are non-diagnostic, then combined metric is non-diagnostic

Secondary Endpoints:

  1. Occurrence and severity of procedure related serious adverse events from index procedure through 30 days after procedure. Hospitalization and ICU admissions
  2. Technical success of procedure defined as ability to collect tissue deemed adequate for cytology or histology. Indeterminate or equivocal or atypical or non-conclusive cytology or histology will be considered failures to this endpoint.
  3. Correlation between impression of malignancy and cytopathology in the ERCP arm compared to the Cholangioscopy arm.
  4. Additional diagnostic accuracy metrics: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value. The assessed strictures will be considered benign if there was no confirmation of malignancy by 6 months after the index procedure.
  5. Impact of ERCP or cholangioscopy on patient management.
  6. Need for additional diagnostic procedures beyond the index procedure.
  7. Procedural measures: Type and number of devices used,
  8. Duration of procedure from duodenoscope in to duodenoscope out

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled, post market study

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18 or older.
  • Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Biliary obstructive symptoms
  • Indeterminate biliary stricture suspected to be intrinsic based on prior imaging

排除标准

  • Contraindications for endoscopic techniques
  • Prior ERCP for assessment of indeterminate biliary stricture
  • Pancreatic head mass identified on prior non-invasive imaging and thought to be the cause of the biliary obstructive symptoms

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic accuracy of cholangioscopy or cholangiography

时间窗: 6 Months

Malignancy will be determined by cytology or histology on tissue sampling during the index procedure, or from other tissue acquisition or surgical specimen histopathology up to 6 months after the index procedure.The assessed strictures will be considered benign if there was no confirmation of malignancy by 6 months after the index procedure. • Overall diagnostic accuracy will be assessed for ERCP impression of malignancy, ERCP-guided brushing and biopsies separately and combined, SpyDS impression of malignancy and SpyBite biopsies

次要结局

  • Additional diagnostic accuracy metrics: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value.(6 months)
  • Occurrence and severity of procedure related serious adverse events(30 days)
  • Technical success of procedure(30 days)
  • Number of patients needed additional diagnostic procedures beyond the index procedure for final diagnosis(6 months)
  • Duration of procedure from duodenoscope in to duodenoscope out(At index procedure)
  • Correlation between impression of malignancy and cytopathology in the ERCP arm compared to the cholangioscopy arm(6 months)
  • Impact of ERCP or cholangioscopy on patient management.(6 months)
  • Number of accessories used(At index procedure.)

研究者

发起方
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mohan Ramchandani

Consultant Gastroenterologist

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

相似试验