跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00630669
NCT00630669已完成不适用

Randomized Study Of Endoscopic Band Ligation Versus Bipolar Probe Electrocoagulation Of Bleeding Internal Hemorrhoids

University of California, Los Angeles1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 45 人开始时间: 1997年12月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
45
试验地点
1
主要终点
treatment success rate

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine which treatment, band ligation (placing rubber bands around the hemorrhoids) or BICAP electrocoagulation (using electricity to cauterize) is safer and more effective endoscopic treatment for bleeding internal hemorrhoids.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Grade II or III internal hemorrhoids with chronic rectal bleeding, which failed at least 8 weeks of intensive medical therapy.
  • •Age over 18 years
  • •A life expectancy of at least 24 months
  • •A signed written informed consent

排除标准

  • •The patient was uncooperative or could not return for routine outpatient follow-up
  • •Severe or end-stage co-morbid illness
  • •Prior endoscopic or surgical treatment of hemorrhoids within the past 6 months
  • •Ongoing need for anticoagulation therapy or high doses of aspirin or non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents
  • •Presence of severe rectal pain
  • •Recently thrombosed internal or external hemorrhoids
  • •Anal stricture,fissure, fistula,or abscess
  • •Rectal carcinoma or bleeding distal colonic polyp
  • •Rectal varices
  • •Acute or chronic colitis
  • •Rectal prolapse
  • •Radiation telangiectasia of the rectum
  • •Prothrombin time >3 seconds over control
  • •Platelet count <75,000

研究组 & 干预措施

1

Active Comparator

Rubber band ligation

干预措施: Rubber band ligation (Procedure)

2

Active Comparator

Bipolar coagulation

干预措施: Bipolar coagulation (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

treatment success rate

时间窗: one year

次要结局

  • treatment complication rate(one year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验