Propofol compared to Morphine and Midazolam for facilitating neonatal intubation: A randomized, controlled trial
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Trial of propofol versus morphine and midazolam for facilitating elective and semi-elective neonatal intubations in a neonatal unit.Neonates of more than 28 weeks' gestational age, needing elective or semi-elective intubation in the neonatal unit.Anaesthesiology - Anaesthetics
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12608000277347
- Lead Sponsor
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Stopped early
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
All infants > 28 weeks' gestation, with parental consent, in the neonatal unit, who need elective or semi-elective endotracheal intubation.
Exclusion Criteria
No parental consent.
Infants with major congenital abnormalities.
Infants with cyanotic congenital heart lesions, incl. infants with duct-dependant circulation.
Infants with hypotension.
Infants with hypovolemia.
Infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy.
Infants who are deemed septic.
Infants with suspected or proven metabolic diseases.
Infants with a family history of metabolic disease.
Infants with pulmonary hypertension
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method