MedPath

Is Myocardial Stunning Induced by Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy a Reality in Critically Ill Patients?

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Acute Kidney Injury KDIGO 3
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Initiated by the Clinician in Charge Without Emergency
Myocardial Stunning
Interventions
Procedure: Continuous renal replacement therapy
Other: Control group
Registration Number
NCT05209230
Lead Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Brief Summary

Myocardial stunning during chronic intermittent hemodialysis is a well-described phenomenon. Little case series of patients presenting myocardial stunning during renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients are reported, with intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy. However, the small sample sizes and the absence of a control arm limit their interpretation, mainly whether the myocardial stunning may be related to cardiac loading conditions variations and whether it may impact the hemodynamic.

The investigator hypothesize that myocardial stunning induced by renal replacement therapy is frequent, independent from cardiac loading conditions and associated with peripheral hypoperfusion.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
42
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age > 18 years old
  • Acute Kidney Injury grade 3 (KDIGO)
  • Indication for renal replacement therapy for the clinician in charge
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Emergency indication to renal replacement therapy (pH<7.15, Kaliemia > 6mmol/L, refractory pulmonary oedema)
  • Poor echogenicity with speckle tracking analysis failure
  • Chronic hemodialysis
  • Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation, left ventricular assist device.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Continuous renal replacement therapy armContinuous renal replacement therapyEchocardiographic evaluation (with 2D speckle tracking analysis of left ventricular segmental function) 1 hour before and 3 hours after the initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy (continuous veno venous hemofiltration) initiation
Control armControl groupTwo echocardiographic evaluations (with 2D speckle tracking analysis of left ventricular segmental function) at an interval of 4 hours, before the continuous renal replacement therapy initiation.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of segment of the left ventricle with regional wall motion abnormalitiesChange between the echocardiography at baseline and the echocardiography 4 hours after.

Numbers of segments of the left ventricle (by patient) with a decrease greater than 20% of the peak systolic longitudinal strain (2D speckle tracking) on the second echocardiography as compared to baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Département d'anesthésie-réanimation Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel Groupe Hospitalier Est

🇫🇷

Bron, France

Ruste Martin

🇫🇷

Bron, France

Hopital Edourd Herriot

🇫🇷

Lyon, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath