The Effect of Surface Treatment of the Dental Implant on the Osseointegration in Mandibular Posterior Missing Teeth
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dental Implants
- Sponsor
- Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
- Enrollment
- 16
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in implant stability
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Dental implants have become a widely accepted treatment modality for the replacement of missing single or multiple teeth in the recent years. In order to meet patients' needs for shorter treatment times and the necessity of dealing with more challenging clinical situations, implants and implant therapies have undergone continuous improvement to improve the function and longevity of the implants. Recently the constant search for improvements in modern implant have been focused on surface modifications so a new era of surface treatment have been showed up; the chemically modified hydrophilic surfaces.
Investigators
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Assistant lecturer of DPH and Clinical statistician
Alexandria University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Missing mandibular posterior teeth.
- •Good oral hygiene (plaque index less than 10 %)
- •Good compliance to the treatment.
- •Participants are free from local or systemic disease
- •Willingness and ability to commit to follow-up placement.
- •Adequate bone height and width to accommodate implant placement and sufficient keratinzed mucosa.
- •At least 3months after tooth extraction
- •Sufficient interocclusal distance
- •Exclusion criteria
- •Presence of persistent and unresolved infection in the implant site
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in implant stability
Time Frame: at baseline and 6 months
The implant stability measurement was examined at the time of insertion of the implants (primary stability) and 6 months (secondary stability) for the two groups of patients using the resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) via the Osstell ISQ system
Biochemical assessment of bone formation
Time Frame: at 3 months
Done by measuring of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) as a bone marker by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Change in bone density
Time Frame: at baseline and 6 months
Cone beam Computerized tomography was used to assess bone denisty
Change in ridge height
Time Frame: at baseline and 6 months
Cone beam Computerized tomography was used to assess ridge height