MedPath

Implementation of P-INPAC

Recruiting
Conditions
Malnutrition, Child
Nutrition Poor
Registration Number
NCT06645639
Lead Sponsor
The Hospital for Sick Children
Brief Summary

The framework for Pediatric Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (P-INPAC) was developed by the Canadian Malnutrition Task Force (CMTF); however, it has not been implemented in a research setting. The framework by CMTF for Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (INPAC) in adults was also implemented in the "More-2-Eat" project which led to development of best practices in nutritional culture of the hospitals. Therefore, we intend to undertake this feasibility project at 3-sites to train staff and evaluate the implementation of P-INPAC components as part of routine healthcare procedure.

Detailed Description

The P-INPAC pilot study will be a 3-phase multi-center research study in hospitalized children, conducted at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, and two other Canadian pediatric centres: Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec and McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario. P-INPAC is an algorithm which helps to identify, assess, and treat children with malnutrition.

In the first phase of the study, we will perform an audit of health records of all hospitalized patients at one selected study ward, one day of every other week for 8 weeks, at each of the 3 study sites to track their routine nutrition care. We anticipate auditing 80-100 patients/site in this cycle (total 240-300 patients). In addition, β‰ˆ12- 20 patients/ site (β‰ˆ 60 in total) who consent to detailed malnutrition screening and assessment would also be identified, assessed, and followed up one month after discharge. In addition, a questionnaire assessing the malnutrition knowledge, attitude, and self-perceived practices (KAP) amongst healthcare professionals will be conducted with staff, including trainees, at each site's study ward. Further, the workload of the study ward's Registered Dietitian (RD) will be assessed for 3 days.

In the second phase of the study, the health care team from each site's study ward will be trained by the site implementation research team about the P-INPAC, and how to administer nutritional screening and perform nutritional assessments, which is the Subjective Global Nutrition Assessment (SGNA).

Finally, in the third phase, we will monitor and evaluate the implementation of the first 2 steps of the P-INPAC (screening \& assessment) over a period of 4 months assessing the acceptability, adoption, and coverage of improved nutrition care practices on the same pediatric study wards. We anticipate auditing 160-200 patients/site in this cycle (total 480-600 patients). In addition, detailed patient level data collection will take place in a selected group of consented patients, β‰ˆ24-40 patients per site from the 3 sites (β‰ˆ120 in total). We would also follow-up with these patients a month after discharge.

Healthcare providers will be invited to answer the KAP questionnaire post-implementation version. We will compare responses from phase 1 with phase 3 (pre-/ post-follow up). And, the workload of the ward RD will be assessed again over 3 days.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
600
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

a. Patients with eating disorder, somatization disorders, ARFID, FORM 1 etc. where the study interaction might interfere with the messaging or therapeutic plan as set out by the responsible team.

Phase 1 and 3 for Health Care Providers inclusion criteria:

  1. Implied consent to participate by completing the KAP questionnaire
  2. Providing clinical service for the select ward

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Baseline nutrition risk screening using STRONGkids or PNST2-month period (phase 1)

Determine routine standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 1 of study using a validated tool, such as, STRONGkids or PNST.

Baseline nutrition risk screening using weight2-month period (phase 1)

Determine routine standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 1 of study using routine anthropometrics - weight

Baseline nutrition risk screening using height or length2-month period (phase 1)

Determine routine standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 1 of study using routine anthropometrics - height or length in children under 2 years of age

Baseline nutrition risk screening using head circumference2-month period (phase 1)

Determine routine standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 1 of study using routine anthropometrics - head circumference in children under 2 years of age

Determine baseline knowledge among healthcare providers using the KAP questionnaire2-month period (phase 1)

Determine baseline knowledge among healthcare providers on recognizing malnutrition and its management in hospitalized children, including perceived barriers and practices, using the KAP questionnaire

Determine changes in knowledge among healthcare providers using the KAP questionnaire4-month period (phase 3)

Determine changes in knowledge among healthcare providers on recognizing malnutrition and its management in hospitalized children in Phase 3, including perceived barriers and practices, using the KAP questionnaire after training was completed in phase 2

Determine success with training and feasibility of nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children using STRONGkids and PNST4-month period (phase 3)

Determine success with training and feasibility of implementing the P-INPAC framework by assessing changes in standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 3 of study using a validated tool, such as, STRONGkids and PNST

Determine success with training and feasibility of nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children using weight4-month period (phase 3)

Determine success with training and feasibility of implementing the P-INPAC framework by assessing changes in standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 3 of study using routine anthropometrics - weight

Determine success with training and feasibility of nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children using height/ length4-month period (phase 3)

Determine success with training and feasibility of implementing the P-INPAC framework by assessing changes in standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 3 of study using routine anthropometrics - height or length in children under 2 years of age

Determine success with training and feasibility of nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children using head circumference4-month period (phase 3)

Determine success with training and feasibility of implementing the P-INPAC framework by assessing changes in standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 3 of study using routine anthropometrics - head circumference in children under 2 years of age

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

McMaster Children's Hospital

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

The Hospital for Sick Children

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Ste-Justine UHC

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

MontrΓ©al, Quebec, Canada

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath