Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01638221
NCT01638221
Unknown
Not Applicable

Comparison of Patient Perceived Pain and Satisfaction Between Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Ascension Health1 site in 1 country200 target enrollmentJuly 2012
ConditionsInguinal Hernia

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Inguinal Hernia
Sponsor
Ascension Health
Enrollment
200
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
pain
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study will be comparing the patients overall satisfaction of two different meshes used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.

Detailed Description

This is a clinical trial comparing standard therapy in the use of either lightweight or heavy mesh for the repair of inguinal hernias. Both types of these meshes have been approved for surgical correction but subjective comparisons of patient overall satisfaction and perceived outcomes have not been measured. The investigators intend to measure certain subjective data in the form of a questionnaire will be issued to the patient preoperatively, one week, one month, six months, and one year after the surgery There is no recent literature comparing subjective data between two meshes called Ultra Pro and Surgi Pro. The biological effects of these meshes have identical properties as far as the healing process and inflammation as well as the low rate of infection. The main difference is the material that these meshes are composed of. The Ultra Pro is made of Prolene while the Surgi Pro is made of polypropylene. The risks are not increased anymore than that for normal surgical complications. They each have the same post operative risks including bleeding, infection and pain, but the investigators are investigating a possible subjective difference between these two separate meshes that are currently used.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2012
End Date
July 2013
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Adam Pentel

DO, general surgery resident

Ascension Health

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • over the age of 18
  • unilateral side to be repaired
  • no major abdominal surgery previously

Exclusion Criteria

  • under age 18
  • bilateral repairs undertaken

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

pain

Time Frame: 1 year

Subjective pain scale rating post surgical

Secondary Outcomes

  • return to activities of daily living(1 year)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials