Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NL-OMON39428
NL-OMON39428
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparative roentgen stereophotogrammetry analysis (RSA) between the conventional Mallory- Head stem in primary uncemented total hip replacement compared to two shorter variations - RSA short Mallory-head total hip prosthesis

Reinier de Graaf Groep0 sites45 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditionsdisabled hiposteoarthritis10005944

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
disabled hip
Sponsor
Reinier de Graaf Groep
Enrollment
45
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last year
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
Reinier de Graaf Groep

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Male and non pregnant female patients between 18\-65 years of age.
  • •2\. Patients with a quetelet index (QI\<\=weight in (kilogram)/ squire length (meters)) \< 35
  • •3\. Patients requiring uncemented primary THR, suitable for the use of the Mallory Head stem
  • •4\. The individual has no clinical relevant contra indications for total hip replacement
  • •5\. The patient is diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular necrosis
  • •6\. The individual is physically and mentally willing and able to comply with postoperative functional evaluation and able to participate in an appropriate rehabilitation schedule.
  • •7\. Patients who signed the Ethics Committee approved specific Informed Consent Form prior to surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\. The patient is unwilling to cooperate with the study
  • •2\. The patient has disorders clinically relevant for total hip replacement
  • •3\. The patient is pregnant or desired to be pregnant after surgery or is using inadequate birth control
  • •4\. Patients who had or will need another joint replacement within six months.
  • •5\. Patients who had a THA on contralateral side more than 6 months ago and the rehabilitation period outcome was considered unsatisfactory or not good. (Patients with contra\-lateral THA \>6 months ago with good outcome (Harris Hip Score \>85\) can be included in the study).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Comparative roentgen stereophotogrammetry analysis of the Global Tissue Sparing (GTS) stem ® compared with uncemented HA coated Taperloc stem.joint wearosteoarthrosis10023213
NL-OMON55416Haaglanden Medisch Centrum50
Completed
Not Applicable
'Comparative roentgen stereophotogrammetry analysis of the Taperloc stem with BoneMaster® nano-technology coating compared with cemented and uncemented HA coated Taperloc stem.'joint wearosteoarthritis10023213
NL-OMON44813Haaglanden Medisch Centrum75
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparative roentgen stereophotogrammetry wear analysis between the X-3 PE insert and the N2Vac PE insert in the Trident metal backed hemispherical cup with attached markers in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty with the ABGII femoral stemarthrosistotal hip arthroplasty10023213
NL-OMON29986Maaslandziekenhuis90
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparative roentgen stereophotogrammetry analysis of the Taperloc stem with BoneMaster® nano-technology coating compared with cemented and uncemented porous coated Taperloc stem.total hip arthroplasty, osteoarthritis, RSA, BoneMaster, coating
NL-OMON26091Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague75
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparative roentgen stereophotogrammetry analysis of the Global Tissue Sparing (GTS) stem® compared with uncemented HA coated Taperloc stem.Joint Arthroplasty, Taperloc, hip, RSA
NL-OMON22203MC HaaglandenReinier de Graaf Groep, Delft50