MedPath

Use of Ibandronate in Diabetic Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT05266261
Lead Sponsor
Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine whether monthly oral administration of ibandronate to postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with type 2 diabetes differs in safety and efficacy compared to patients without diabetes.

Detailed Description

There are two major considerations in the use of bisphosphonates in diabetic patients.

* The low rate of bone turnover in diabetic patients is at risk of side effects such as excessive inhibition of bone turnover associated with the use of bisphosphonates.

* A decrease in osteocalcin following bisphosphonate use may lead to deterioration of glucose metabolism.

The efficacy of ibandronate in T2DM is not thought to be significantly different based on previous studies, but there is few study on ibandronate.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
121
Inclusion Criteria
  • age of at least 55 years at the time of screening
  • postmenopausal woman
  • diagnosis of osteoporosis
Exclusion Criteria
  • history of osteoporosis treatment
  • underlying disease (e.g., heart failure, liver disease, renal disease, or malignancy)
  • the use of drugs that affect bone metabolism (e.g., steroids, immunosuppressants, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, aromatase inhibitors, thiazolidinedione drugs, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants)
  • history of adverse effects of bisphosphonate or difficulty taking the drug due to an inability to sit or the presence of upper gastrointestinal disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Non-diabetesIbandronate Oral Tabletpostmenopausal women with normal glucose tolerance
diabetesIbandronate Oral Tabletpostmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bone mineral density1 year

. Percentage change in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck, presented as least square mean and 95% confidence interval.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bone turnover markers6 month and 12 month

Percentage change in bone turnover markers \[Serum C-telopeptide (CTx) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) levels were measured by immunoassay methods using Elecsys kits - 07296355001V4 and 07296509001V4 (Roche Diagnostic Corp., Basel, Switzerland) \] presented as adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval using the generalized estimating equations for repeated measures analysis.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Yeouido St.Mary's Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath