Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02787928
NCT02787928
Terminated
Phase 1

Dose and Response of Intrathecal Hydromorphone in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System

Virginia Commonwealth University1 site in 1 country14 target enrollmentApril 2016

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Intervention
Intrathecal hydromorphone
Conditions
Cesarean Section
Sponsor
Virginia Commonwealth University
Enrollment
14
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Narcotic Pain Medication
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

In the United States the incidence of cesarean deliveries have increased over the last several decades and is currently approximately 30% nationwide. The anesthesia and analgesia for elective c-sections vary between institutions.

Parturients present a unique challenge for the anesthesiologist as the mother has to care not only for herself, but also for the newborn postpartum. While intrathecal opioids provide adequate pain relief, they do so at the cost of bothersome side effects for patients, such as pruritus and nausea/vomiting.

Intrathecal hydromorphone has started to be explored as a new option for intrathecal analgesia. A study done by Beatty et al. showed in a retrospective review that 40 mcg of intrathecal dilaudid was safe and effective as compared to intrathecal morphine for analgesia after cesarean delivery. Additionally they showed no difference in side effect profiles of the two medications. Mhyre et al. investigated the use of 100 mcg of intrathecal dilaudid with hyperbaric bupivacaine in varying dosages for labor analgesia. The results were inconclusive, but the dosage of hydromorphone was reported to be without adverse effects.

Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems has successfully instituted the use of intrathecal morphine with superior analgesia but with undesired side effects, most notably pruritus. Recent drug shortages of duramorph have prompted investigators to seek alternative options for post cesarean section analgesia. The investigators are interested in determining the dose, efficacy, and side effect profile of intrathecal hydromorphone. Although our institution has never utilized intrathecal hydromorphone for our patient population, it has been studied at various other institutions where it has been found to be safe and efficacious with an acceptable side effect profile.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2016
End Date
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification less than or equal to 3 Elective cesarean section Able to obtain a signed consent in English Patients who are 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

  • ASA greater than 3 or major medical comorbidities that are not optimized Patient refusal or contraindications to neuraxial/study drugs. Allergy to study drugs Conversion to general anesthesia Any patient who does not receive any multimodal regimen (PO acetaminophen, +/- PO ibuprofen/IV ketorolac) Any patient who is taking PO/IV opioids or buprenorphine during the current pregnancy

Arms & Interventions

Intrathecal Dilaudid

This will be a prospective up/down dosage study. After obtaining informed consent, eligible participants will be part of an up/down dose titration study. This first phase of our study will be conducted using intrathecal (spinal) hydromorphone to determine an appropriate dose range for our study population. Study drug dose will initially be 40 mcg. The only deviation from the current standard of care will be that patients will be given hydromorphone intrathecally instead of morphine. The rest of the care provided will be standard of care and per current practices at VCU labor and delivery floor.

Intervention: Intrathecal hydromorphone

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Narcotic Pain Medication

Time Frame: 12 hours post administration of intrathecal hydromorphone

Dose failure defined as requiring more than oxycodone 5 or 10 mg q 4 hours and a 1x PRN of IV hydromorphone

Secondary Outcomes

  • Infant Outcome(up to 10 minutes)
  • Nausea(4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours after placement of intrathecal hydromorphone)
  • Pruritus(4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours after placement of intrathecal hydromorphone)
  • Sedation(4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours after placement of intrathecal hydromorphone)
  • Pain(4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours after placement of intrathecal hydromorphone)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials