MedPath

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Orbital Atherectomy System in de Novo Calcified Lesions

Recruiting
Conditions
Angiography
Coronary Calcification
Interventions
Device: Diamondback 360TM orbital atherectomy system
Registration Number
NCT05417022
Lead Sponsor
Centre Recherche Cardio Vasculaire Alpes
Brief Summary

This is a French, prospective, single-arm, multi-center registry to confirm the safety and efficacy of the Diamondback 360 TM Orbital Atherectomy System in the preparation of de novo calcified coronary lesions before implantation of a coronary endoprothesis in adult subjects. The primary safety endpoint is 30-day MACE and the efficacy endpoint is procedural success.

Detailed Description

Treatment of calcified lesions, caused in 6 to 20% of patients, remains a challenge.

Presence of coronary calcifications complicates stent placement resulting in up to 50% malapposition or under-expansion of the stent and is associated with a higher frequency of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

In order to reduce these risks, preparation of these lesions before the implantation of a coronary stent is essential. The arrival on the European market of a new Orbital atherectomy system leads to consider its use in the preparation of such lesions.

The orbital atherectomy system uses a diamond-coated eccentric crown that abrades calcified plaque and develops pulsatile forces on the wall. It reduces calcified plaque and modifies plaque with fractures, facilitating stent placement and allowing for optimal stent expansion.

ORBIT I and ORBIT II clinical trials were conducted in the United States to evaluate the safety of using the Orbital Atherectomy System in de novo calcified coronary lesions in adults. These 2 trials demonstrated that orbital atherectomy not only facilitated stenting, but also improved clinical outcomes compared to historical outcomes.

The recent obtaining of CE marking allows the use of this very promising medical device in France.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
300
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects ≥ 18 years
  • Patients with a clinical indication for coronary angioplasty and presenting a de novo calcified lesion
  • The target vessel reference diameter must be >= 2.5mm and <= 4.0 mm.
  • Lesion length <= 40 mm
  • The target vessel must be a coronary artery with a stenosis of >70%
  • Patients able to understand and provide informed consent
  • Patients with Social Security coverage
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with an LVEF < 25%.
  • Patient with hypersensitivity to egg, soy or peanut proteins or to one of the active substances or one of the excipients of ViperSlide lubricant.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Unwilling or unable to sign the Informed Consent
  • Patients under judicial protection, tutorship or curatorship
  • Angiographic criteria: Intra-stent stenosis, Presence of a chronic total occlusion (CTO), Bypass lesion, Target vessel excessively tortuous, Presence of a thrombus, Presence of a single permeable vessel

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Diamondback 360TM orbital atherectomy systemDiamondback 360TM orbital atherectomy system-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Safety Endpoint : Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)30 days

The Diamondback 360°® Orbital Atherectomy System safety was evaluated by a composite of MACE at 30-days post procedure. MACE is composed of :

* Myocardial infarction : Type I and/or Type IV

* TVR - defined as revascularization at the target vessel after the completion of the index procedure.

* Cardiac death.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Safety Endpoint : 12 Month MACE12 months

See MACE definition in the primary outcome.

Efficacy Endpoint : Revascularization success rateUntil hospital discharge after index procedure, average estimated at 48 hours

Revascularization success was defined as successful stent placement with \< 30% residual stenosis and without severe angiographic complications during intervention and/or MACE during the period of the patient's hospitalization.

Severe angiographic complications were defined as severe dissection (Type C to F) , perforation and persistent slow flow or no flow, Atrioventricular conduction disorder.

Safety endpoint : Comparison of MACE with rotational atherectomy30 days

The safety of Orbital Atherectomy System will be compared to rotational atherectomy by comparing the MACE rate at 1 month recorded in this study and that recorded in the Euro4C Study.

Trial Locations

Locations (17)

Clinique Rhône Durance

🇫🇷

Avignon, France

Hôpital de la Timone

🇫🇷

Marseille, France

Centre Hospitalier Antibes - Juan-Les-Pins

🇫🇷

Antibes, France

Hôpital Européen de la Roseraie

🇫🇷

Aubervilliers, France

Centre Hospitalier d'Avignon

🇫🇷

Avignon, France

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon - La Seyne/Mer

🇫🇷

Toulon, France

Pôle Santé République - ELSAN

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Centre Hospitalier de Haguenau

🇫🇷

Haguenau, France

Centre Hospitalier Marne la Vallée

🇫🇷

Jossigny, France

Hôpital Privé du Confluent

🇫🇷

Nantes, France

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

🇫🇷

Nîmes, France

Clinique Saint Hilaire

🇫🇷

Rouen, France

GCS-ES Axium-Rambot

🇫🇷

Aix-en-Provence, France

Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble

🇫🇷

Grenoble, France

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Institut Arnault Tzanck

🇫🇷

Saint-Laurent-du-Var, France

CHU Strasbourg

🇫🇷

Strasbourg, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath