Enhancing Community Participation Outcomes Among Young Adults With Serious Mental Illnesses Through Peer-Delivered Decision Support
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 16
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Change in Temple University Community Participation Measure (sufficiency)
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to pilot test a peer-delivered decision support intervention ("peer decision coaching") designed to enhance decision-making about community participation among young adults with serious mental illness (SMI).
详细描述
The overarching goal of this study is to pilot test a peer-delivered decision support intervention ("peer decision coaching") designed to enhance decision-making about community participation among young adults with serious mental illnesses (SMI). We will use a single-group, pre-post, convergent mixed methods design to explore implementation and whether and how the intervention impacts decision-making and community participation outcomes. We will aim to recruit 40 participants in this intervention study. This design will enable us to link themes regarding participants' experience of the intervention with quantitative measures of decision-making and community participation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 30 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •18-30 years of age;
- •Experiencing a SMI, as determined by: (a) self-reported psychiatric diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum or major affective disorder, and (b) self-reported current or past functional impairment due to experiencing mental health challenges in one or more major life areas (i.e., work school, social activities)
- •Able to identify at least 2 areas of community participation that individuals want to be doing more in in the next 6 months
- •Current sufficiency of community participation (i.e., number of important participation areas done enough / number of important participation areas) of 50% or less.
排除标准
- •Unable to provide informed consent, as assessed by research staff using an active recall method
- •limited ability to act on decisions due to self-reported legal, residential, or guardianship restrictions.
结局指标
主要结局
Change in Temple University Community Participation Measure (sufficiency)
时间窗: Baseline, through intervention completion (up to 3 months)
Sufficiency scores on the Temple University Community Participation Measure assess how satisfied individuals are with their amount of community participation in areas that are important to them. Possible scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Change in Temple University Community Participation Measure (breadth ratio)
时间窗: Baseline, through intervention completion (up to 3 months)
Breadth ratio scores on the Temple University Participation Measure assess breadth of participation in areas considered important to a person. Possible scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Decision Satisfaction Scale Score at post-intervention
时间窗: Post-intervention (up to 3 months post-baseline)
The Decision Satisfaction Scale assesses a person's satisfaction with a health decision. Possible scores range from 6-30, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Change in decision self-efficacy scale
时间窗: Baseline, through intervention completion (up to 3 months)
The Decision Self-Efficacy Scale assesses confidence in making an informed choice. Possible scores range from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Change in decisional conflict scale
时间窗: Baseline, through intervention completion (up to 3 months)
The Factors Contributing to Uncertainty subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale measures decision-making needs. Possible scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Decision-making behaviors at post-intervention
时间窗: Post-intervention (up to 3 months post-baseline)
Number of behaviors (range: 0-6) endorsed on Decision-Making Behaviors scale at post-intervention.
次要结局
未报告次要终点