Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03367169
NCT03367169
Terminated
Not Applicable

Comparison of the Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Reduction in the Surgery of the Pilon Fractures

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand1 site in 1 country54 target enrollmentNovember 23, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pilon Fractures
Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Enrollment
54
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Healing
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

The assessment consists in comparing the osteosynthesis plate with minimally invasive technique versus open reduction and internal fixation.

The aim of study is to compare (period of bandage, efficacy, safety), these two types of surgical technique by using a prospective, randomized analysis.

Detailed Description

Several surgical techniques exist and among plate osteosynthesis, there is a minimally invasive method and the open reduction method. Investigators think that the minimally invasive method with intern plate is more efficient than the open reduction method. These techniques may better preserve perifracture soft tissues, hematoma. It may lead to a smaller muscle detachment. The minimally invasive technique allows a more efficient vascularization of the fracture site, what would increase bone healing and the functional prognosis of tibial pilon lesions. It's all these issues investigators would like to assess with a randomized study.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 23, 2017
End Date
April 26, 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • More than 18-year-old with opened or closed pilon fracture Cauchoix type 1,
  • signed patient consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Open pilon fracture cauchoix type 2 or 3,
  • infection of the operating site,
  • previous osseous disease
  • patient who are unwilling or unable to give consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Healing

Time Frame: at 45 days

Measure of the duration of the bandage with index form of follow-up the state cutaneous of the wound. This measure was a number.

Secondary Outcomes

  • AOFAS clinical score(pre op, 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months)
  • Radiologic evaluation(pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months)
  • The Foot & Ankle Disability Index(pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months)
  • Complications(pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months)
  • Nach mazur and al score(pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months)
  • Pain(pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials