Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02049892
NCT02049892
Completed
Not Applicable

A Comparison of Large Diameter Metal Heads vs. Small Diameter Metal Heads vs/ Dual Mobility Total Hip Replacements

Mayo Clinic1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentDecember 1, 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Total Hip Replacement
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Metal Ion levels
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Does having a large diameter metal on polyethylene total hip replacement increase metal ion release. Larger metal heads are thought to have increased torsional forces on the trunion which would like release more metal ions. Increased metal ion levels have been associated with adverse local tissue reactions. Are there any differences comparing these groups to a dual mobility type total hip replacement.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 1, 2013
End Date
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Robert T. Trousdale

PI

Mayo Clinic

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • One total hip replacement, either a large metal head (\>40) or a small metal head (\<30) on a polyethylene bearing surface.
  • 2 to 5 years s/p surgery minimum. No symptoms

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any other bearing surface besides metal on poly, no other joint replacements, symptomatic

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Metal Ion levels

Time Frame: 2 years

We would like to determine a difference in metal ion levels on metal on polyethylene total hip replacement

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials