MedPath

Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification-methods: HF EasyTip 2.2mm vs. HF EasyTip 2.8mm

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Cataracts
Interventions
Procedure: cataract surgery
Registration Number
NCT01936740
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative efficiency, safety and postoperative outcomes of cataract surgery with two different "high-fluidic" settings.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • bilateral age-related cataract
  • good overall physical constitution
  • LOCS 2-5
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • previous intraocular surgery or ocular trauma
  • previous corneal pathology
  • previous endothelial cell count <1200
  • glaucoma
  • uveitis
  • PEX
  • diabetic retinopathy and any other severe retinal pathology that would make a postoperative visual acuity of 20/40 (decimal equivalent = 0.5) or better unlikely
  • intraocular complication like posterior capsular
  • postoperative comlpications (e.g. postoperative uveitis)
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
HF easyTip 2.2mmcataract surgeryThe phacoemulsifications tip used was the easyTip 2.2mm tip (Oertli Instruments, Berneck, Switzerland). The cristaline lens was divided into four quadrants using an aspiration flow rate of 10ml/min and vacuum of 70 mmHg. The quadrants were aspirated using the following linear power and fluidic settings: aspiration flow rate 45ml/min, vacuum 600 mmHg, bottle height 100cm.
HF easyTip 2.8mmcataract surgeryThe phacoemulsifications tip used was the easyTip 2.8mm tip (Oertli Instruments, Berneck, Switzerland). The cristaline lens was divided into four quadrants using an aspiration flow rate of 10ml/min and vacuum of 70 mmHg. The quadrants were aspirated using the following linear power and fluidic settings: aspiration flow rate 50ml/min, vacuum 600 mmHg, bottle height 100cm.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
phacoemulsification timeintraoperative

time spent for the phacoemulsification process was the phacoemulsification tip time (PTT) needed to divide the nucleus and the PTT needed to conquer it

effective phacoemulsification timeintraoperative

time in seconds required had 100% power been used throughout the phacoemulsification process documented for the separation of the nucleus (divide) and the aspiration of the quadrants (conquer)

fluid volumeintraoperative

amount of BSS used for dividing and conquering

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
postoperative corneal oedema1 day, 1 week, 6 months

central corneal thickness

postoperative endotheial cell loss6 months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry of the Medical University Vienna

🇦🇹

Vienna, Austria

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath