Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification-methods: HF EasyTip 2.2mm vs. HF EasyTip 2.8mm
- Conditions
- Cataracts
- Interventions
- Procedure: cataract surgery
- Registration Number
- NCT01936740
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative efficiency, safety and postoperative outcomes of cataract surgery with two different "high-fluidic" settings.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- bilateral age-related cataract
- good overall physical constitution
- LOCS 2-5
- previous intraocular surgery or ocular trauma
- previous corneal pathology
- previous endothelial cell count <1200
- glaucoma
- uveitis
- PEX
- diabetic retinopathy and any other severe retinal pathology that would make a postoperative visual acuity of 20/40 (decimal equivalent = 0.5) or better unlikely
- intraocular complication like posterior capsular
- postoperative comlpications (e.g. postoperative uveitis)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description HF easyTip 2.2mm cataract surgery The phacoemulsifications tip used was the easyTip 2.2mm tip (Oertli Instruments, Berneck, Switzerland). The cristaline lens was divided into four quadrants using an aspiration flow rate of 10ml/min and vacuum of 70 mmHg. The quadrants were aspirated using the following linear power and fluidic settings: aspiration flow rate 45ml/min, vacuum 600 mmHg, bottle height 100cm. HF easyTip 2.8mm cataract surgery The phacoemulsifications tip used was the easyTip 2.8mm tip (Oertli Instruments, Berneck, Switzerland). The cristaline lens was divided into four quadrants using an aspiration flow rate of 10ml/min and vacuum of 70 mmHg. The quadrants were aspirated using the following linear power and fluidic settings: aspiration flow rate 50ml/min, vacuum 600 mmHg, bottle height 100cm.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method phacoemulsification time intraoperative time spent for the phacoemulsification process was the phacoemulsification tip time (PTT) needed to divide the nucleus and the PTT needed to conquer it
effective phacoemulsification time intraoperative time in seconds required had 100% power been used throughout the phacoemulsification process documented for the separation of the nucleus (divide) and the aspiration of the quadrants (conquer)
fluid volume intraoperative amount of BSS used for dividing and conquering
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method postoperative corneal oedema 1 day, 1 week, 6 months central corneal thickness
postoperative endotheial cell loss 6 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry of the Medical University Vienna
🇦🇹Vienna, Austria