Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02118441
NCT02118441
Completed
Not Applicable

A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Direct Palpation For Radial Artery Catheterization Among Cardiac Anesthesiologists

University of British Columbia1 site in 1 country129 target enrollmentAugust 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Time to Insertion of Radial Artery Cannulation
Sponsor
University of British Columbia
Enrollment
129
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time to Successful Radial Arterial Catheterization
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

When a patient undergoes heart surgery, their Anesthesiologist will insert a tiny plastic tube, called a catheter, in the artery of the patient's wrist. This is called a radial artery catheter. A radial artery catheter allows accurate measurement of the patient's blood pressure during surgery. There are two common techniques for placing the radial artery catheter. The first is a "blind" technique whereby the Anesthesiologist feels for the pulse in the patient's wrist and places the catheter using the location of the pulse as a guide. The second technique, less commonly used, is one whereby the Anesthesiologist uses an ultrasound machine (painless to the patient) to "see" the artery, and thereby uses the ultrasound to guide the catheter placement. Our study will test the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization will have faster insertion times, with fewer complications compared with palpation-guided insertion.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2013
End Date
May 2014
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients undergoing cardiac surgery
  • Age 19 or older
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Suspected inability to comply with study procedures, including language difficulties or medical history and/or concomitant disease, as judged by the investigator
  • Previous surgery at the site of proposed radial artery catheterization
  • Any vascular condition that may preclude eligibility for radial artery line insertion as judged by the investigator
  • Patients with ventricular assist devices
  • Previous inclusion in this study

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to Successful Radial Arterial Catheterization

Time Frame: up to 5 minutes

The time to successful radial arterial catheterization was defined as time zero to time of placement. Time zero for the DP group began when the anesthesiologist's fingers were placed on the patient with the purpose of palpating the artery. Time zero for the US group began when the US transducer was first placed on the patient's skin for the purpose of identifying the radial artery. Time to placement was defined as the interval from time zero until the time at which an arterial tracing was viewed on the monitor.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of Attempts(up to 5 minutes)
  • Complication Rate (Hematoma)(up to 5 minutes)
  • Number of Re-directions(up to 5 minutes)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials