MedPath

Impact of an Automated Telephone Intervention on Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Type 2 Diabetes

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Interventions
Behavioral: automated telephone intervention vs. usual care
Registration Number
NCT00700908
Lead Sponsor
University of Minnesota
Brief Summary

Aim 1. Determine the impact of a daily, automated telephone intervention on HbA1c levels compared to standard care in older patients with type 2 diabetes.

Aim 2. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on adherence to prescribed SMBG frequency in older patients with type 2 diabetes.

Aim 3. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on self-reported diabetic control problems in older patients with type 2 diabetes.

Aim 4. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on self-reported attitudes and health beliefs concerning diabetes in older patients with type 2 diabetes

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age greater or equal to 55
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • English speaking
  • Ability to use glucose meter
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Unwilling to allow SMBG levels to be shard with primary care physician

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1automated telephone intervention vs. usual careAutomated telephone intervention
2automated telephone intervention vs. usual careUsual care
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in HbA1cthree months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in adherence to SMBG frequencythree months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Primary Care Center University of Minnesota

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath