Evaluation of Efficacy and Comfort: A Randomized Clinical Trial on the Incrediwear Back Brace in Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Enrollment
- 100
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Brace and sleeve utilization
Overview
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that the utilization of Incrediwear's Back Brace, compared to a sham brace and a standard-issue brace, will lead to better brace adherence, increased patient satisfaction, reduced pain medication usage, and improved functional disability among non-surgical chronic LBP patients.
Detailed Description
Problem: Chronic low back pain (LBP) affects a substantial portion of the population and often leads to decreased functional ability and increased pain medication usage. While back braces have been recommended as part of LBP management, their efficacy and impact on patient outcomes remain uncertain.
Research Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the utilization of Incrediwear's Back Brace, compared to a sham brace and a standard-issue brace, will lead to better brace adherence, increased patient satisfaction, reduced pain medication usage, and improved functional disability among non-surgical chronic LBP patients.
Importance of the Research: This randomized clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy of Incrediwear's Back Brace in improving patient outcomes for chronic LBP. The study will provide valuable insights into the utilization patterns and adherence of back braces, patient satisfaction with treatment protocols, and the impact of brace usage on pain medication consumption and functional disability. By evaluating these factors through a controlled trial, the investigators seek to enhance the understanding of effective LBP management strategies, potentially reducing the burden of chronic LBP on patients and healthcare systems.
The study will be conducted under the guidance of Dr. Akhil Chhatre, Principal Investigator at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. The research will involve 100 non-surgical chronic LBP patients meeting specific inclusion criteria. The patients will be randomly assigned to one of four study groups, and data will be collected through phone calls over a full 4-week duration.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Supportive Care
- Masking
- Single (Participant)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Male or female, age \> 18
- •Has undergone treatment for an initial episode of nonspecific low back pain (LBP) lasting \> 1 month, with one of the following causative "Principle Diagnoses":
- •Disc herniation
- •Facet arthropathy
- •Compression fracture
- •Spondylolisthesis
- •Sacroiliac joint dysfunction
- •Scoliosis
- •Mild to moderate central spinal stenosis
- •Lumbar spondylosis
Exclusion Criteria
- •Severe central spinal stenosis
- •Focal lower extremity weakness
- •LBP radiating beyond the knee and/or accompanied by neurological signs (including sciatica)
- •Spinal operation within 5 years preceding the study date
- •Secondary LBP due to a work accident (e.g. workers comp)
- •History of spinal arthrodesis
- •LBP with an inflammatory, tumor, or infectious cause
- •Contraindications to: Step I or II analgesics, NSAIDs, Benzodiazepines
- •Diagnosed peripheral arterial disease
- •Higher functions do not enable proper comprehension of protocol or reliable data recording
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Brace and sleeve utilization
Time Frame: 1 month
Self-reported hours worn
Pain as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 month
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and frequency (ordinal scale). 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as it could possibly be
User Evaluation of Satisfaction as assessed by the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0)
Time Frame: 1 month
Satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 \[QUEST 2.0\] score). The score ranges from 1-5 with 1 being not satisfied at all to 5 being very satisfied
Pain medication name
Time Frame: 1 month
The investigators aim to explore the effects of brace utilization on pain medication use. The investigators will document the pain medication name
Pain medication dosage used
Time Frame: 1 month
The investigators aim to explore the effects of brace utilization on pain medication use. The investigators will document the pain medication dosage used
Functional disability status as assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 1 month
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). A total score of 0-4 (no disability), 5-14 (mild disability), 15-24 (moderate disability), 25-34 (severe disability), 35-50 (completely disabled)
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported