MedPath

Effects of Virtual Reality on Transtibial Amputation Physiotherapy Outcomes

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Virtual Reality
Interventions
Other: Exercise
Registration Number
NCT03872193
Lead Sponsor
Hacettepe University
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality applications on quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and gait parameters in individuals with transtibial amputation. 20 Transtibial amputee were included in study. All participants were using transtibial prothesis with active vacuum system at least 1 year. Participants were divided into two groups. While a group of virtual reality applications were being performed additionally standart physiotherapy, only standard physiotherapy methods were applied in the second group. Balance and gait practices were performed for each group. Individuals were treated for 3 days a week for 4 weeks, and individuals were evaluated before and after treatment. Individuals were evaluated for quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and time-distance parameters of walking.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality applications on quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and gait parameters in individuals with transtibial amputation.20 transtibial amputee with 36 mean age were included in study. All participants were using transtibial prothesis with active vacuum system at least 1 year. Participants were divided into two groups. While a group of virtual reality applications were being performed, standard physiotherapy methods were applied in the second group. Balance and gait practices were performed for each group. Individuals were treated for 3 days a week for 4 weeks, and individuals were evaluated before and after treatment. Individuals were evaluated for quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and time-distance parameters of walking.

For this purpose, SF-36 Questionnaire, 6-minute walking test, one leg rest time, Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scale, wearable biometric device and footprint method were utilized. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in pre-treatment and post-treatment performance, balance and gait parameters in the groups of individuals (p \<0.05). The quality of life pain parameter was statistically decline in the group receiving virtual reality (p\<0.05). On the other hand, significant differences in the quality of life and prosthesis adaptation of the individuals were not found between the groups (p\> 0.05). The results of this study showed that virtual reality practices and standard physiotherapy methods are effective on performance, balance and walking in transtibial amputee rehabilitation. It is thought that it will be important to perform virtual reality applications in amputee rehabilitation separately in both methods, in addition to standard physiotherapy methods, to include in rehabilitation process, to bring an ability of alternative application to professionals working in this area and to work about amputees with using different suspension systems and with different amputation levels.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • transtibial and unilateral amputation
  • At least 1 year prothesis usage, 18- 65 year age,
  • At least 15 min independent walking ability,
  • Stabile stump volume,
  • Standart stump lentgh,
  • Enough kognition for evaluation and tests.
Exclusion Criteria
  • walking and other activities to prevent; shortness of muscle, limitation of joint motion and phantom pain in stump, presence of any discomfort or systemic health problem that may affect the gait outside the amputation
  • presence of visual problems to prevent participation in virtual reality applications,
  • use of walking aids

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Physio TherapyExerciseWe intervention this group some routine exercises. They had balance exercises, gait training,incline surface gait,bloked surface gait training and recreational activities. Extremity strengthenin exercises,balance exercises and increasing endurance are applied for this amputees.
Virtual RealityExerciseThis group had physical therapy program plus virtual reality exercises. They had balance exercises, gait training,incline surface gait,bloked surface gait training and recreational activities. Extremity strengthenin exercises,balance exercises and increasing endurance are applied for this amputees. And virtual reality exercises were done for this group. Skiing,kayak, football,rafting and jumping activities were done in this exerciese.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Performance Test6 minute

6 minute walk test,higher values represent a better

Gait Parameters6 minute

Wearable Biometric Device

Quality of Life measured of individuals: SF-36 Scale10 minute

SF-36 Quality of Life Scale, higher values represent a better

Balance Test5 minute

Single Leg Balance Test,higher values represent a better

Prothesis Satisfaction: Trinity Amputation Prothesis Experience Scale5 minute

Trinity Amputation Prothesis Experience Scale; 5 point likert scale,5-75 point, activity limitation,physicosocial adaptation,prothesis satisfaction

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath