COMPARISON OF RESPIRATORY COMPLICATIONS WITH MICROCUFF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBES AND LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/10/058407
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology SMS Medical College and attached Hoapitals Jaipur
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.ASA I and II
2.Weight between 10 to 30 kg
3.Elective inguinal, urology procedure for which patients are intubated with ETT or LMA.
4.Patient willing to participate in study
Exclusion Criteria
1.Patient with acute respiratory infection.
2.Patient with difficult airway.
3.Emergency surgeries.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.To determine the difference in perioperative respiratory complications with microcuff endotracheal tubes versus laryngeal mask airway(Blockbuster). <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: <br/ ><br>After insertion of device
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine the difference in hemodynamic parameters with microcuff ETT versus LMA(Blockbuster).Timepoint: Baseline <br/ ><br>After induction of anaesthesia. <br/ ><br>Immediately after intubation. <br/ ><br>1 mins after intubation <br/ ><br>3 mins after intubation <br/ ><br>5 mins after intubation <br/ ><br>7 mins after intubation <br/ ><br>10 mins after intubation;To determine the difference in time taken to secure the airway with microcuff ETT versus LMA(Blockbuster).Timepoint: After insertion of device;To determine the difference in number of attempts to secure the airway with microcuff ETT versus LMA(Blockbuster).Timepoint: After insertion of device