Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02404246
NCT02404246CompletedNot Applicable

Pilot Trial of Peer Support for Bipolar Disorder

Kaiser Permanente2 sites in 1 country88 target enrollmentStarted: December 2005Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
88
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Mean differences in depression scores using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID) for current depression and LIFE measure and timeline for depression

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This pilot effectiveness trial will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a structured peer support program based on the Certified Peer Specialist Program of the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA).

Detailed Description

Bipolar disorder is a chronic and often disabling illness affecting 1-2% of US adults. Peer support programs are an innovative and promising model to reverse demoralization, activate consumers to seek more effective care, develop consumers' self-management skills, and restore participation in work and other social roles. Peer-led programs can address key barriers to dissemination of effective psychosocial treatment. This pilot effectiveness trial will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a structured peer support program based on the Certified Peer Specialist Program of the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA). Following the philosophy of recovery, the intervention focuses on:

  • Motivating consumers to develop an expectation of recovery
  • Encouraging regular self-monitoring of mood symptoms
  • Training consumers to develop self-management skills for symptom control and problem solving
  • Activating consumers to be more informed partners in care and more effective self-advocates
  • Motivating and assisting consumers to reclaim work and other rewarding social roles

The investigators will use a rigorous research design to evaluate how structured peer support promotes core values of mental health recovery. Impact of the intervention will be judged across a range of outcomes:

  • Long-term control of mood disorder symptoms
  • Optimal participation in work and other rewarding social roles
  • Consumers' perceptions of autonomy and full participation in the treatment process Findings from this pilot study will inform the development of a full-scale effectiveness trial to include a broader range of participants and health care settings.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • GHC members aged 18 and over with Bipolar Disorder Type 1 or Type 2 and at least 6 weeks during the past 3 months with a depression or mania/hypomania Psychiatric Status Rating of 3 or greater (indicating significant symptoms at least half of the time). Potential participants will not be excluded because of medical, psychiatric, or substance use comorbidity.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Children under age 18.

Arms & Interventions

Intervention Arm

Experimental

Intervention evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a structured peer support intervention based on the Certified Peer Specialist Program of the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA).

Intervention: Peer support program (Behavioral)

Usual Care

No Intervention

Usual Care

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mean differences in depression scores using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID) for current depression and LIFE measure and timeline for depression

Time Frame: up to 9 months

Mania PSR scores using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID) for mania/Hypo-mania and LIFE measure and timeline for mania

Time Frame: up to 9 months

Intervention program effects on consumer's perceptions of care across follow-ups using self-efficacy tool, POPP Empowerment ("Well-Being Module") and Health Care Climate questionnaire

Time Frame: up to 9 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mean number of weeks using mania PSR scores during follow-ups.(up to 9 months)
  • Mean number of weeks with depression during follow-ups.(up to 9 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials