CILCA Registry: Aortic Arch Variant With a Common Origin of the Innominate and Left Carotid Artery. Management and Outcomes of Open and Endovascular Repair.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 500
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Angulation of ascending aortic curvature
研究概览
简要总结
This registry aims to provide insights on the pathogenic mechanisms that expose subjects with CILCA arch to the increased risk of postoperative complications. So, the CILCA arch registry will capture clinical data and medical images of subjects with CILCA arch treated by surgical or endovascular (TEVAR) means.
Study Design: International Multicenter and Observational registry
Estimated Enrolment: 500 patients, with competitive enrolment.
Clinical Follow up: Postoperatively at 30 days, at 12 months, and yearly after.
详细描述
The so-called "bovine" aortic arch (BAA) is characterized by the presence of a common origin of the innominate and left carotid artery, or, less frequently, by the origin of the left carotid directly from the innominate artery (i.e. type 2 BAA). In the present protocol, for brevity and according to the STROBE guidelines the investigators employed the acronym CILCA (common origin of the innominate and left carotid artery) arch, previously employed in publications of our group.
The CILCA is the second more common arch configuration, and its prevalence in the general population is 13.6%, with relevant differences among ethnic groups. However, the real prevalence of the CILCA is likely underestimated, because its presence is largely unreported due to the presumed clinical irrelevance of this anatomical variant. In fact, the peculiar anatomical features associated with the CILCA mandate specific management strategies and preoperative planning in both surgical and endovascular procedures involving the aortic arch, including type A aortic dissection repair and carotid stenting.
There is increasing evidence in the literature that the CILCA represents a potential determinant of the onset of thoracic aortic disease. Notably, it is associated with a 1.4-fold increased risk of developing aortic aneurysms or dissections, and this entails a relevant prevalence of this anatomical variant among patients requiring thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In fact, the CILCA presents a consistent and peculiar anatomical pattern compared with standard arch configuration, which provides relevant information for TEVAR planning, and may have prognostic implications.
This registry aims to provide insights on the pathogenic mechanisms that expose subjects with CILCA arch to the increased risk of postoperative complications. So, the CILCA arch registry will capture clinical data and medical images of subjects with CILCA arch treated by surgical or endovascular (TEVAR) means.
Technical and specific aims:
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Other
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age ≥ 18 years old
- •CILCA arch treated for an aortic disease (i.e. aortic dissection, aneurysm)
排除标准
- •Contraindications to computed tomography (e.g. hypersensitivity to contrast media, renal failure);
- •Suspected or manifested pregnancy
结局指标
主要结局
Angulation of ascending aortic curvature
时间窗: From Admission to 5 years follow-up
Comparison among the Type of Arch (TOA), among pre- and post-Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) or Open repair
Arch angle
时间窗: From Admission to 5 years follow-up
Comparison among the TOA, among pre- and post-TEVAR or Open repair
Volume of the ascending aorta (cm3)
时间窗: From Admission to 5 years follow-up
Comparison among the TOA, among pre- and post-TEVAR or Open repair
Centerline curvature radius (mm)
时间窗: From Admission to 5 years follow-up
Comparison among the TOA, among pre- and post-TEVAR or Open repair
Outer curvature radius (mm)
时间窗: From Admission to 5 years follow-up
Comparison among the TOA, among pre- and post-TEVAR or Open repair
Centerline tortuosity
时间窗: From Admission to 5 years follow-up
Comparison among the TOA, among pre- and post-TEVAR or Open repair
次要结局
- Area of proximal landing zones (PLZs, mm2)(From Admission to 5 years follow-up)
- Arch length of PLZs (mm)(From Admission to 5 years follow-up)
- Maximum diameter of PLZs (mm)(From Admission to 5 years follow-up)
- β angle of PLZs (°)(From Admission to 5 years follow-up)
- Tortuosity angle (°)(From Admission to 5 years follow-up)
研究者
Massimiliano M. Marrocco-Trischitta
Vascular surgeon
Ospedale San Donato
