MedPath

Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI in Diagnosing and Staging Liver Cancer Using UNOS Policy

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Liver Cancer
Interventions
Drug: iodinated contrast dye
Other: Eovist-enhanced MRI
Registration Number
NCT01082224
Lead Sponsor
American College of Radiology Imaging Network
Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as contrast-enhanced CT scan and contrast-enhanced MRI, may help find liver cancer and find out how far the disease has spread.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying contrast-enhanced CT scan and contrast-enhanced MRI in diagnosing and staging liver cancer in patients with chronic liver disease.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* To compare the sensitivity of multiphase contrast-enhanced CT scan to that of multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI using non-specific contrast agents for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease.

Secondary

* To compare the positive predictive value (PPV) of CT scan to that of MRI for diagnosing HCC.

* To compare the lesion-level sensitivity and PPV of CT scan and MRI as interpreted by radiologists at the respective transplant centers.

* To compare the sensitivity and specificity of multiphase contrast-enhanced CT scan vs MRI for diagnosing residual or recurrent HCC after local ablative therapy in patients listed for liver transplant.

* To determine the accuracy of imaging-based diagnosis and staging of HCC in clinical practice using the new Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) liver-imaging criteria compared with the reference standard of pathologic diagnosis and staging at the time of explantation.

* To explore whether the comparisons of sensitivity and PPV are affected by stratifying patients by AFP level (elevated vs normal). (Exploratory)

Tertiary

* To assess the sensitivity and PPV of MRI and CT interpreted at the participating sites on the basis of all available information and sequences and compare the sensitivity and PPV of the two modalities interpreted using the main study criterion. (Exploratory)

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to AFP level (elevated vs normal).

Patients undergo CT scan with iodinated contrast agent and MRI with extracellular gadolinium contrast agent (both standard-of-care and study-related) at baseline and at 90-day intervals while on the liver transplant wait list.

After transplantation, the explanted liver will be analyzed for biomarkers and other studies.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
440
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Waitlisted with HCC-Exception PointsEovist-enhanced MRIParticipants undergo CT and MRI every 90 days for the trial with iodinated contrast dye and motexafin gadolinium, during liver transplant wait listing. Possible Eovist-enhanced MRI substudy participation
Waitlisted with HCC-Exception Pointsiodinated contrast dyeParticipants undergo CT and MRI every 90 days for the trial with iodinated contrast dye and motexafin gadolinium, during liver transplant wait listing. Possible Eovist-enhanced MRI substudy participation
Waitlisted with HCC-Exception Pointsmotexafin gadoliniumParticipants undergo CT and MRI every 90 days for the trial with iodinated contrast dye and motexafin gadolinium, during liver transplant wait listing. Possible Eovist-enhanced MRI substudy participation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sensitivity of contrast-enhanced CT scan vs contrast-enhanced MRI for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)Within 90 Days Before Transplantation
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lesion-level sensitivity and PPV of contrast CT scan vs contrast MRIWithin 90 Days Before Transplantation
Accuracy of imaging-based diagnosis and staging of HCC in clinical practice using the new OPTN liver-imaging criteria compared with the reference standard of pathologic diagnosis and staging at the time of explantationWithin 90 Days Before Transplantation
Positive predictive value (PPV) of CT scan vs MRI for diagnosing HCCWithin 90 Days Before Transplantation
Sensitivity and specificity of multiphase contrast-enhanced CT scan vs MRI for diagnosing residual or recurrent HCCWithin 90 Days Before Transplantation
Diagnostic value of sensitivity and PPV when patients are stratified by AFP level (elevated vs normal)Within 90 Days Before Transplantation

Trial Locations

Locations (9)

Lahey Clinic Medical Center - Burlington

🇺🇸

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

The Methodist Hospital for Liver Disease and Transplant

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Mayo Clinic Scottsdale

🇺🇸

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Washington University, St. Louis

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Georgetown University Hospital

🇺🇸

Washington, District of Columbia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath