A Transdiagnostic Intervention for Health-related Habits (LEV)

Study 1: Completion rate participants

时间窗: 6 month after starting the screening

How many of the participants that started using Lev (i.e., completing screening with Lev-s) completed Lev (i.e., completing, 2 out of 3 steps)

Study 1: Well-being before and after the intervention measures by The Evaluation Questionnaire

时间窗: Directly after completing the last treatment module in LEV (approximately at 20 weeks)

("How would you rate your well-being prior to the intervention?", "How would you rate your current well-being") at T1 and T2 on a scale 1-10 (1= very poor, 10= very good)

Study 1: Completion rate healthcare workers

时间窗: 6 month after completing the training.

how many of the healthcare workers that had received training in Lev started using it within 6 months

Study 1: Treatment satisfaction healthcare workers (individual sessions)

时间窗: Immediately after completing session 3. An average of 4-8 months from baseline

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after session 3 using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction. 1. The content of this session feels relevant 2. The degree of difficulty in conveying the content of the session is at a reasonable level for me as a therapist 3. Is there something else you would like to add?

Study 1: Level of treatment credibility healthcare workers

时间窗: Immediately after the intervention (mean time 20 weeks)

Was Lev perceived as creditable and by healthcare workers using Treatment and Credibility Scale. Four items for credibility and one for expectation on a 10 point Likert scale where higher values indicate higher credibility.

Study 1: Treatment satisfaction participants (the whole intervention)

时间窗: Directly after completing the last treatment module in LEV (approximately at 10 weeks)

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after competing the whole intervention using Patient Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction. 1. As a whole, the Lev has been clearly focused on how I can live healthier 2. My knowledge of how I can have healthier habits has increased 3. I can better deal with problems connected to my health-related habits 4. I have had the opportunity to contribute opinions during the Lev 5. I would consider participating in a similar interventions in the future The participants also rated the course as a whole following the school grading system ''Failed,'' ''Passed,'' ''Passed with distinction,'' and ''Passed with special

Study 1: Open answer questions regarding Treatment satisfaction measured by The Evaluation Questionnaire

时间窗: Directly after completing the last treatment module in LEV (approximately at 20 weeks).

The treatment satisfaction questionnaire also included open questions that will be analyses using a qualitative thematic approach including the following questions: 1. I feel that participating in Lev helped me in these ways 2. How could the Lev have been better? 3. What could I have done differently myself? 4. Is there anything else you would like to add? A qualitative, thematic analysis will be performed to identify more general themes. There is not a template or scale to extract the themes. One rater suggest categories based on the similarity of answers. Another rater organizes the answers in the suggested themes. To be considered a theme, there must be over 85% similarity between raters.

Study 1: Adverse events after the intervention

时间窗: During the intervention up to week approximately week 20.

Adverse events will be defined as spontaneous oral complaints or instances when patients stated that they experienced negative or unwanted effects during the intervention period. Serious adverse events will be defined as events that involved hospital care/hospitalization, etc. due to the intervention.

Study 1: Level of treatment credibility participants

时间窗: Immediately after the intervention (mean time 20 weeks)

Was Lev perceived as creditable and by participants using Treatment and Credibility Scale . Four items for credibility and one for expectation on a 10 point Likert scale where higher values indicate higher credibility.

Study 1: Treatment satisfaction participants (individual sessions)

时间窗: After completing the third module in Lev. An average of 4-8 month from baseline

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after session 3 using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction. 1. After the meeting today, my knowledge of how I can change my lifestyle have increased. 2. I will benefit from what we talked about during the meeting today 3. The content of the meeting felt relevant based on my own experiences 4. I understood the advice and strategies I was given that will help my change mine lifestyle habits 5. I feel confident in how to use the advice and strategies 6. I will use the advice and strategies 7. I was listened to, the therapist understood my situation 8. I was involved and helped to come up with suggestions for how I can reach my goals 9. Is there something else you would like to add?

Study 2: What general themes underlying unhealthy and healthy habits can be found in individuals with disabilities?

时间窗: During the second step in Lev (Approximately at 5-10 weeks)"

Healthcare workers are instructed to enter what strategies they gave to the participant. Strategies from step 2 (page 16 workbook). The themes are extracted based on answers to the following two questions: This is what others can do to help me: ....... I can do this myself:... A qualitative, thematic analysis will be performed to identify more general themes. There is not a template or scale to extract the themes. One rater suggest categories based on the similarity of answers. Another rater organizes the answers in the suggested themes. To be considered a theme, there must be over 85% similarity between raters.