MedPath

Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Limited Elective Neck Dissection in Early Cancers of Oral Cavity NoDe Negative

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Mouth Neoplasms
Interventions
Procedure: Sentinel Node Biopsy
Procedure: Limited Elective Neck Dissection
Registration Number
NCT05774483
Lead Sponsor
Tata Memorial Hospital
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the survival outcomes, morbidity and cost-effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy versus limited elective neck dissection in node-negative early oral cancers.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Survival outcomes

* Morbidity outcomes

* Cost-effectiveness

Participants will either undergo sentinel node biopsy followed by completion neck dissection if sentinel node is reported to be metastatic (SNB) or limited elective neck dissection where level IIb will be cleared only if level IIa is metastatic (limited END). The study will compare the outcomes in the two cohorts.

Detailed Description

Based on the current literature, we know that elective neck dissection (END) is mandatory in clinically node-negative early oral cancers. However, this leads to overtreatment and morbidity in about 55-80% of patients. The emergence of recent level I evidence makes SNB the standard of care in this setting. However, its limitation of being a two-staged procedure, steep learning curve, the burden on resources, lack of infrastructure, short-lasting decrease in morbidity and lack of cost-effectiveness data limits its wide applicability. It is our routine departmental practice of performing limited neck dissection clearing level I-III/IV sparing level IIb which is cleared only if level IIa is metastatic. It is hypothesized that limited END would limit the morbidity of shoulder dysfunction and be a more feasible and cost-effective treatment option which could be a suitable alternative to SNB in this setting without compromising the survival outcomes. With this background, we propose to embark upon a phase III RCT comparing the oncologic outcomes and morbidity of SNB versus limited END. We hypothesize that limited END would have survival outcomes non-inferior, morbidity similar to SNB with higher cost-effectiveness.

Aims and objectives:

Aim To compare the survival outcomes, morbidity and cost-effectiveness of SNB versus limited END in node-negative early oral cancers

Primary objective

1) Overall survival

Secondary objectives

1. Shoulder morbidity (key secondary endpoint) longitudinally up to 2 years

2. Disease-free survival

3. Neck nodal recurrence-free survival

4. Other side effects (chyle leak, hematoma, lymphoedema)

5. Longitudinal Quality of life up to 2 years

6. Cost-effective analysis

Exploratory objectives Blood and tumour tissue will be collected and banked for biomarker studies. Exploratory analyses will be conducted at a later date. Efforts may be directed to identify the biomarkers to predict nodal metastasis.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
508
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age >18 years of age
  2. Biopsy-proven invasive squamous cell carcinoma involving the site tongue and buccal mucosa
  3. T1 and T2 lesions as per AJCC TNM 8 edition
  4. Clinicoradiologically node negative
  5. Amenable to per oral excision
  6. Treatment naïve
  7. No other site of malignancy
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Previous surgery in the head and neck region,
  2. Upper alveolar or palatal lesions
  3. Large heterogeneous leukoplakia or other premalignant lesions
  4. Previous malignancy in the head and neck region
  5. Patients requiring the free flap reconstruction

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Sentinel node biopsySentinel Node Biopsy-
Limited elective neck dissectionLimited Elective Neck Dissection-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall survival3 years

Defined from the date of randomization to death due to any cause

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Disease free survival3 years

Defined from the date of randomization to any recurrence (local, regional or distant metastasis) and second primary in the oral cavity

Shoulder morbidityLongitudinally at preoperatively, 3 months, at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months of treatment

It will be assessed using the neck dissection impairment index (NDII). The range of movement of the shoulder will also be assessed using a goniometer

Health related Quality of lifeLongitudinally at preoperatively, 3 months, at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months of treatment

Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 and QLQ HN35 instruments

Neck nodal recurrence3 years

Defined from the date of randomization to isolated neck node recurrence or death due to any cause

Adverse events related to the surgical procedure and lymphedemaThe lymphedema rating will be done at 3 months, at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months of treatment

Details of the intra and perioperative delay including injury to critical structures, chyle leak, haemorrhage, and head and neck lymphedema

Cost effectiveness3 years

Based on direct cost comparison

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Tata Memorial Hospital

🇮🇳

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

ACTREC

🇮🇳

Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Mpmmcc & Hbch

🇮🇳

Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath