Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03592394
NCT03592394
Unknown
Phase 3

Immersive Virtual Reality for Chronic Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Feasibility Trial

Kathleen Friel1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentJuly 2016

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Spinal Cord Injuries
Sponsor
Kathleen Friel
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Neuropathic Pain Scale
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that SCI patients using immersive IVR training will show improved reduction of neuropathic pain that will outlast the training sessions and transfers into daily life.

Detailed Description

Neuropathic pain (NP) affects 40 to 70% of people with SCI and is a very disabling clinical condition. The definitions of NP as well as its neurophysiology are widely discussed in the literature. Many treatment options have been offered, but provide limited effects, leaving people with SCI with a reduced quality of life. Pain is a very complex experience that depends strongly on cognitive, emotional, and educational influences. Despite intensive investigations, the cause of neuropathic pain often remains unknown. A careful assessment of the pain including the use of tools to objectively measure pain will help with the diagnosis and the quantification of the damage. These tools include: 1) Laboratory testing that uses quantitative tests and measures objective responses in neurophysiology, sensory evoked potentials...etc.; 2) Quantitative sensory testing, that tests the perception of pain in response to external stimuli; 3) Bedside examination: physicians assessment on location, quality and intensity of pain; 4) Pain questionnaires, depending entirely on the subject's self-reported experience. When spinal cord injury occurs, the spinal somatosensory circuit is thought to generate aberrant nociceptive impulses that the brain interprets as pain. Thalamic circuits may also serve as amplifiers of nociceptive signals. Sensory deafferentation after injury to the spinal cord produces extensive and long-lasting reorganization of the cortical and subcortical sensory maps. It has been suggested that pain and phantom limb sensations are the consequence of those cortical plasticity change. Therefore, strategies aimed at reversing or modulating the somatosensory neural reorganization may be valuable alternative approaches to neuropathic pain. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is an emerging approach to the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions in SCI. Despite promising initial studies, IVR therapy has not yet been made widely available to individuals with SCI, because equipment is expensive and can be difficult for clinicians to use, especially those with limited experience with technology. However, with the development of 'plug and play', low-cost IVR devices such as the Oculus Rift, Gear VR and Google Cardboard, IVR no longer requires such specific technical knowledge. As a result, IVR is now a feasible and affordable treatment option for neuropathic pain. The investigators believe that IVR neurorehabilitation exploits the idea of inducing activation in action observation, motor imagery, and processing systems, which in turn, should activate downstream cortical areas involved in movement and motor imagery. Also, perturbations of the somatosensory system associated with central pain can be reversed or modulated by employing motor imagery and related task execution combined with visual illusions. The investigators hypothesize that SCI patients using immersive IVR training will show improved reduction of neuropathic pain that will outlast the training sessions and transfers into daily life.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2016
End Date
December 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Kathleen Friel
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Kathleen Friel

Lab Director, Clinical Laboratory for Early Brain Injury Recovery

Burke Medical Research Institute

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Presence of chronic neuropathic pain at or below SCI level for at least 6 months following trauma or disease of the spinal cord;
  • A pain intensity of at least 4 out of 10 in the numerical rating scale (NRS) in the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) test at both screening (baseline) and randomization (pre-evaluation);
  • Stable pharmacological treatment for at least 2 weeks prior to the study and throughout the trial;
  • Incomplete lesion (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale, AIS B, C or D; B= motor complete, sensory incomplete; C= sensorimotor incomplete with an average strength of the muscles below the level of the lesion \<3, D= sensorimotor incomplete with average muscle strength \>3);
  • Cervical level of lesion (C2 to T1) with presence of pain in the upper extremities

Exclusion Criteria

  • Presence of severe pain of other origin, such as musculoskeletal pain
  • Psychiatric or other neurological disorders
  • Head injuries causing cognitive or visual impairment
  • Severe vertigo
  • Presence of potential risk factors for brain stimulation (TMS): history of seizures, presence of surgically implanted foreign bodies such as a pacemaker, metal plate in the skull, and metal inside the skull;
  • Medically unstable

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Neuropathic Pain Scale

Time Frame: Baseline compared with immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up

It includes 11 items, assessing global pain intensity, unpleasantness, and one item which allows the patient to describe the temporal aspects of their pain and its qualities in their own words. The remaining 8 items assess specific NP qualities: "Sharp," "Hot," "Dull," "Cold," "Sensitive," "Itchy," "Deep," and "Surface." This is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in neuropathic pain after a therapeutic intervention.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)(Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up)
  • Modified Ashworth Scale(Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up)
  • Immersive Tendencies Questionnaire (ITQ)(Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up)
  • Patient's Global Impression of Change(Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up)
  • The Presence Questionnaire(Baseline, post-intervention, and 1 month follow up)
  • Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III)(Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up)
  • Beck Depression Inventory(Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up)
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials