Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Early Implant Placement: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Tooth Fractures
- Sponsor
- Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- Enrollment
- 100
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Midfacial recession
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Immediate implant placement (IIP) has been an attractive treatment concept for both patients and clinicians due to reduced surgical interventions and total treatment span. Although soft-tissue alterations or midfacial recession have been demonstrated in previous studies, recent studies have reported positive result following IIP with the modification of surgical interventions. However, high-quality evidence (≥Ib: evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial) on comparing the clinical outcome of IIP with early implant placement (type 2) is limited.
Investigators
Junyu Shi
Principal investigator, clinical professor,Department of Implant Dentistry
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •age ≧18 years
- •single hopeless teeth in anterior maxilla
- •enough apical bone volume to achieve primary stability (\>4mm)
Exclusion Criteria
- •active periodontoal infection
- •incomplete buccal bone plate
- •unwilling to participate
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Midfacial recession
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
Recession of midfacial gingival level before extraction and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Outcomes
- Probing depth(T2:crown delivery, T3: 1-year follow-up)
- Bleeding on probing %(T2:crown delivery, T3: 1-year follow-up)
- Pink esthetic score(T2:crown delivery, T3: 1-year follow-up)
- Visual Analogue Scale assessement(T1: immediately after surgery,T2:crown delivery, T3: 1-year follow-up)
- Papillae recession(1-year follow-up)
- marginal bone loss(1-year follow-up)