Retrospective & Prospective Observational Study of Patients With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
- Conditions
- ThrombocytopeniaThrombocytopenia in Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraThrombocytopenic Purpura
- Interventions
- Other: Retrospective Chart ReviewOther: Patient-reported Outcome QuestionnairesOther: Physician Survey
- Registration Number
- NCT00454857
- Lead Sponsor
- Amgen
- Brief Summary
This is a multi-center prospective observational descriptive study complemented by a retrospective chart review. Patients diagnosed with ITP and currently treated for ITP by a hematologist or hematologist-oncologist will be recruited from community-based clinics and academic/referral centers. They will be followed prospectively for a period of 12 months. At inception, participants' charts will also be reviewed from the date of enrollment retrospectively to the date of diagnosis or the previous 36 months, whichever is less.
- Detailed Description
Time Perspective: 12 months prospective chart review study with a retrospective chart review for a period up to 36 months from the start of the study, since the date of diagnosis for ITP.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 326
- Has a diagnosis of ITP according to the American Society of Hematology guidelines (George et al., 1996).
- Is equal to or greater than 18 years of age.
- Is willing and able to complete a series of questionnaires.
- Before any study-specific procedure, the appropriate written informed consent must be obtained.
- Participated in clinical trial(s) during the past 36 months.
- Is considering participation in a clinical trial within the next 12 months.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients with ITP Physician Survey Participants with ITP and currently treated for ITP were followed prospectively for a period of 12 months. Patients with ITP Retrospective Chart Review Participants with ITP and currently treated for ITP were followed prospectively for a period of 12 months. Patients with ITP Patient-reported Outcome Questionnaires Participants with ITP and currently treated for ITP were followed prospectively for a period of 12 months.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants Utilizing Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Therapies for First-line Treatment Includes the retrospective chart review (from the date of enrollment retrospectively to the date of diagnosis or the previous 36 months, whichever was less) and the prospective portion of the study (enrollment through Month 12). The number of participants who received ITP therapies for first-line treatment during either the retrospective or prospective phases of the study.
The Number of Participants Utilizing ITP Therapies for Second-line Treatment. Includes the retrospective chart review (from the date of enrollment retrospectively to the date of diagnosis or the previous 36 months, whichever was less) and the prospective portion of the study (enrollment through Month 12). The number of participants who received ITP therapies for second-line treatment during either the retrospective or prospective phases of the study.
The Number of Participants Utilizing ITP Therapies for Third-line Treatment. Includes the retrospective chart review (from the date of enrollment retrospectively to the date of diagnosis or the previous 36 months, whichever was less) and the prospective portion of the study (enrollment through Month 12). The number of participants who received ITP therapies for third-line treatment during either the retrospective or prospective phases of the study.
The Number of Participants Utilizing ITP Therapies: Treatments With Unknown Starting Date. Includes the retrospective chart review (from the date of enrollment retrospectively to the date of diagnosis or the previous 36 months, whichever was less) and the prospective portion of the study (enrollment through Month 12). The number of participants who received ITP therapies for treatments with unknown starting date during either the retrospective or prospective phases of the study.
The Number of Participants Utilizing ITP Therapies for Fourth-line Treatment. Includes the retrospective chart review (from the date of enrollment retrospectively to the date of diagnosis or the previous 36 months, whichever was less) and the prospective portion of the study (enrollment through Month 12). The number of participants who received ITP therapies for fourth-line treatment during either the retrospective or prospective phases of the study.
The Number of Participants Utilizing ITP Therapies for Sixth-line Treatment. Includes the retrospective chart review (from the date of enrollment retrospectively to the date of diagnosis or the previous 36 months, whichever was less) and the prospective portion of the study (enrollment through Month 12). Assessed the number of participants who received ITP therapies for sixth-line treatment during either the retrospective or prospective phases of the study.
The Number of Participants Utilizing ITP Therapies for Fifth-line Treatment Includes the retrospective chart review (from the date of enrollment retrospectively to the date of diagnosis or the previous 36 months, whichever was less) and the prospective portion of the study (enrollment through Month 12). The number of participants who received ITP therapies for fifth-line treatment during either the retrospective or prospective phases of the study.
The Number of Participants Utilizing ITP Therapies for Seventh or Greater-line Treatment. Includes the retrospective chart review (from the date of enrollment retrospectively to the date of diagnosis or the previous 36 months, whichever was less) and the prospective portion of the study (enrollment through Month 12). The number participants who received ITP therapies as seventh or greater-line treatment during either the retrospective or prospective phases of the study.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants Receiving Drug Therapies for Treatment of ITP During the Prospective Phase 12 months (prospective data collection phase) The number of participants who received drug therapies for the treatment of ITP during the prospective phase of the study. Use of multiple medications by the same participants is possible.
Duration of Exposure to ITP Medication 12 months (prospective data collection phase) Duration of exposure to each ITP medication measured from enrollment until the end of the 12-month data collection phase.
Number of Participants Requiring Splenectomy 12 months The number of participants who required a splenectomy during the 12-month prospective phase of the study.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Quality of Life Measured by the ITP-Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) Baseline to month 12 during prospective data collection phase The Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ) was developed to assess disease-specific quality of life (QoL) in adults with ITP. It is a 44-item questionnaire that includes scales for physical health (symptoms, fatigue/sleep, bother, and activity), emotional health (psychological and fear), overall QoL, social activity, women's reproductive health, and work. Scores for each scale range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Treatment Satisfaction Baseline to Month 12 during prospective data collection phase Participant satisfaction with treatment was measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), an 11-item questionnaire providing scores on four scales - side effects, effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. TSQM Scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction with treatment.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS) Baseline to Month 12 during prospective data collection phase The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' (score = 100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (score = 0).