Improving Decision-Making for Low Health Literate Prostate CA Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 327
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Decisional Conflict Scale
研究概览
简要总结
This study used a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether Healium (designed to target preference elicitation) is as efficacious as Healing Choices (a comprehensive education and decision tool) in improving outcomes for decision-making and emotional quality of life.
详细描述
Background: Elicitation of patients' preferences is an integral part of shared decision making, the recommended approach for prostate cancer decision making. However, existing decision aids for this population do not specifically focus on patients' preferences. Healium is a brief interactive web-based decision aid that aims to elicit patient's treatment preferences and is designed for a low health literate population. This study used a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether Healium (designed to target preference elicitation) is as efficacious as Healing Choices (a comprehensive education and decision tool) in improving outcomes for decision-making and emotional quality of life.
Method: Patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who had not yet made a treatment decision were randomly assigned to the brief Healium intervention or Healing Choices, an extensive decision aid previously developed by our group that serves as a virtual information center on prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Assessments were completed at baseline, 6-weeks and 3-months post-baseline, and included decisional outcomes (decisional conflict, satisfaction with decision, preparation for decision-making), and emotional quality of life (anxiety/tension and depression), along with demographics, comorbidities, and health literacy.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Care Provider)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer and eligible for all treatment options (ie., surgery, radiation, active surveillance);
- •had not yet made a treatment decision or begun treatment; and
- •have basic proficiency (grade school level) in reading English.
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Healium
Healium is a web-based platform that employs a user-centric design and aims to appeal to a low health literate population. It features a simple language and layout, a large font size, contrasting text and background colors, bright color palette, and use of short labels and headings to describe content.
干预措施: Healium (Behavioral)
Comparison (Healing Choices)
The Healing Choices program represents a virtual health center that patients visit to obtain disease and treatment-related information. The software was designed to be open to exploration with an intuitive layout, without restrictions in terms of order of access. Information is stored in virtual rooms, such as a library, a conference room showing videos by survivors who discuss their approach to treatment, and physician offices containing videos of physicians representing different treatment specialties. All information was extensively vetted by health education experts of the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Services (CIS).
结局指标
主要结局
Decisional Conflict Scale
时间窗: 3 months post-baseline
Decisional Conflict was measured with the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), a well-validated scale consisting of 16 items that assess four dimensions: informed, clarity, uncertainty, and support. The response ranges are on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. To come up with a total score, the 16 items are summed, divided by 16 and multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).
Decisional Conflict Scale
时间窗: 6 weeks post-baseline
Decisional Conflict was measured with the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), a well-validated scale consisting of 16 items that assess four dimensions: informed, clarity, uncertainty, and support. The response ranges are on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. To come up with a total score, the 16 items are summed, divided by 16 and multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).
次要结局
- Profile of Mood States-Short form(3 months post-baseline)
- Profile of Mood States- Short form(6 weeks post-baseline)
