MedPath

3D-printed Bone Models in Addition to CT Imaging for Intra-articular Fracture Repair

Not Applicable
Conditions
Distal Humerus Fracture
Distal Femur Fracture
Proximal Humeral Fracture
Distal Tibia Fracture
Interventions
Other: 3D printed (3DP) bone models + CT imaging
Other: CT imaging
Registration Number
NCT04748016
Lead Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 3D-printed bone models in addition to CT imaging versus CT imaging alone on surgical quality and operation time for patients undergoing surgical repair of intra-articular fractures.

Detailed Description

Surgical fixation of intra-articular fractures is a technically demanding task that poses significant challenges to orthopaedic surgeons. Articular fragments may be comminuted, depressed, or impacted, and neighbouring soft tissue is often heavily compromised. Furthermore, aggressive surgical dissection is typically necessary to achieve adequate visualisation, and anatomical reduction often devitalises bone fragments and invites deep infection. The management of intra-articular fractures requires a well-designed preoperative plan and a skilfully executed surgical tactic to guarantee the best possible outcome. Multiplanar reformation (CT-MPR) and three-dimensional reconstruction (CT-3DR) are imaging techniques that have enhanced intraoperative visualisation, however, accurate analysis of complex fractures remains challenging.

3D printing is a rapidly developing, low-cost technology that is already being applied across numerous contexts in orthopaedics and traumatology. 3D printed bone models can be produced from digitised CT data in a matter of hours, providing a dimensionally accurate representation of the patient's skeleton which approximates real-life visual and tactile experiences. When used in preoperative planning, these models have shown to improve surgeon communication and shorten surgical duration. Despite positive early results, few clinical studies have studied the effect of 3D bone model use on surgical outcome. The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of intraoperatively utilised 3D bone models in addition to conventional CT imaging on reduction quality and surgical duration versus CT imaging alone for patients undergoing surgical fixation of complex intraarticular fractures.

Patients providing informed consent will be screened for eligibility. All eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a double-blind manner (participant and outcome assessor) to receive surgical fracture fixation with or without the addition of sterilised 3D-printed bone models to standard CT imaging for intraoperative visualisation.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  1. age 18 years or older
  2. with intra-articular fracture of the proximal or distal humerus, proximal ulna, proximal radius, distal femur, or proximal or distal tibia (pilon fracture)
  3. requiring anticipated surgical repair of fracture
  4. with pre-operative CT scan already available as part of routine assessment
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. pathological fracture
  2. multiple fractures requiring simultaneous or staged operations
  3. fractures around the hip, pelvis and acetabulum, and any other fracture types not specified in the inclusion criteria
  4. requiring surgery within 24 hours of admission
  5. unable or unwilling to give consent to participate
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
3D-printed models plus CT imaging3D printed (3DP) bone models + CT imagingFracture repair surgery using sterilized 3DP models, CT-MPR and CT-3DR for planning and intraoperative visualization
CT imaging aloneCT imagingFracture repair surgery using CT-MPR and CT-3DR for planning and intraoperative visualization
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality of articular surface reduction grading assessed by three-point scaleImmediately post-operation

The quality of articular surface reduction will be rated by two surgeons blinded to intervention allotment assessing post-operative and intraoperative fluoroscopic images. The Kappa value will be recorded for inter-observer agreement between two observers (1. Perfect reduction, 2. Observable imperfections 1-2mm, 3. Significant imperfections \>2mm)

Skin to skin duration of surgery (minutes)Immediately post-operation

The skin to skin duration of the surgery will be recorded.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total fluoroscopy time (seconds)Immediately post-operation

The total intraoperative fluoroscopy time will be recorded in seconds.

Total length of skin incision (mm)Immediately post-operation

The total length on the incision will be measured post operation.

Incidence of surgical complications3 months post-operation

Incidence of infection, neurological deficit, wound breakdown, loss of fixation, revision surgery will be recorded at follow up.

Intraoperative blood loss (mL)Immediately post-operation

The patient's blood loss during the surgery will be recorded.

Total tourniquet time (minutes)Immediately post-operation

Total time the tourniquet was applied will be recorded.

Quality of articular surface reduction grading assessed by three-point scale3 months post operation

The quality of articular surface reduction will be rated by two surgeons blinded to intervention allotment assessing post-operative and intraoperative fluoroscopic images. The Kappa value will be recorded for inter-observer agreement between two observers (1. Perfect reduction, 2. Observable imperfections 1-2mm, 3. Significant imperfections \>2mm)

Health-related quality of life measured by SF-12 Chinese (HK) version3 months post-operation

12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), a patient-reported outcome measure of HRQOL comprised of a mental component (MCS) and physical component (PCS), each with a final score ranging from 0 (worst outcome) to 100 (best outcome).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong

🇭🇰

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath