跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03650959
NCT03650959已完成不适用

Optimizing Resource Utilization During Proficiency-Based Training of Suturing Skills to Medical Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Faculty-Led, Peer Tutor-Led, and Computer Augmented Methods of Teaching

Queen's University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 44 人开始时间: 2018年6月4日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
44
试验地点
1
主要终点
Number of stitched laid to reach proficiency

研究概览

简要总结

Evidence favours teaching procedural skills to medical students using a proficiency-based rather than time-based approach. Basic suturing skills can be taught through faculty-led, peer tutor-led, and computer augmented approaches. One method has yet to be identified as superior in terms of educational outcomes, resource utilization, and participant perspectives.

Pre-clerkship medical students were randomized to: faculty, peer tutor, or computer augmented learning. Participants practiced suturing through their randomized method until they reached targeted proficiency defined using hand motion analysis (HMA). Proficiency was defined as a score of the average plus a standard deviation of five surgeons' HMA for two of three consecutive sutures using appropriate technique.

The primary outcome was the number of stitches placed to achieve proficiency. The secondary outcomes were the number of sutures used, time, and costs incurred. Learning curves were constructed. Participants' perceptions were assessed using a follow-up survey.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Second year, pre-clerkship medical students

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Faculty-led

Experimental

干预措施: Method of learning simple interrupted sutures with instrument tie (Other)

Peer tutor-led

Experimental

干预措施: Method of learning simple interrupted sutures with instrument tie (Other)

Computer augmented self-directed learning

Experimental

干预措施: Method of learning simple interrupted sutures with instrument tie (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Number of stitched laid to reach proficiency

时间窗: Five days

次要结局

  • Individual costs to reach proficiency(Five days)
  • Number of sutures used to reach proficiency(Five days)
  • Minutes to reach proficiency(Five days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Boris Zevin

Assistant Professor & Medical Education Scholar

Queen's University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验