MedPath

Performance of Bioabsorbable Vascular Scaffolds (Absorb) Compared to Xience Stents - an Optical Coherence Tomography Study

Conditions
Bioresorbable Scaffolds
Registration Number
NCT02001025
Lead Sponsor
Rudolf Berger
Brief Summary

The biodegradable ABSORB scaffold is characterized by a greater strut thickness, but it has a greater flexibility compared to the XIENCE stent. Due to its fragility the inflating pressure of the ABSORB scaffold is limited and suitable lesions have to be well prepared. This study assesses the incidence of malapposed stent-struts, and the frequency of stent-underexpansion and edge dissection after ABSORB implantation compared to the XIENCE stent.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
adverse post-stenting results1 year

Malapposition, underexpansion and edge dissections assessed with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Medical University of Vienna

🇦🇹

Vienna, Austria

Medical University of Vienna
🇦🇹Vienna, Austria
Rudolf Berger, PD MD
Principal Investigator
Daniel Dalos, MD
Sub Investigator
Clemens Gangl, MD
Sub Investigator
Christian Roth, MD
Sub Investigator
Thomas Neunteufl, Prof. MD
Sub Investigator
Georg Delle-Karth, Prof. MD
Sub Investigator
Irene Lang, Prof. MD
Sub Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.