Performance of Bioabsorbable Vascular Scaffolds (Absorb) Compared to Xience Stents - an Optical Coherence Tomography Study
- Conditions
- Bioresorbable Scaffolds
- Registration Number
- NCT02001025
- Lead Sponsor
- Rudolf Berger
- Brief Summary
The biodegradable ABSORB scaffold is characterized by a greater strut thickness, but it has a greater flexibility compared to the XIENCE stent. Due to its fragility the inflating pressure of the ABSORB scaffold is limited and suitable lesions have to be well prepared. This study assesses the incidence of malapposed stent-struts, and the frequency of stent-underexpansion and edge dissection after ABSORB implantation compared to the XIENCE stent.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method adverse post-stenting results 1 year Malapposition, underexpansion and edge dissections assessed with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Medical University of Vienna
🇦🇹Vienna, Austria
Medical University of Vienna🇦🇹Vienna, AustriaRudolf Berger, PD MDPrincipal InvestigatorDaniel Dalos, MDSub InvestigatorClemens Gangl, MDSub InvestigatorChristian Roth, MDSub InvestigatorThomas Neunteufl, Prof. MDSub InvestigatorGeorg Delle-Karth, Prof. MDSub InvestigatorIrene Lang, Prof. MDSub Investigator