A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Adults With Severe or Very Severe Alopecia Areata
- Registration Number
- NCT03899259
- Lead Sponsor
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Brief Summary
The reason for this study is to see if baricitinib is safe and effective in adults with severe or very severe alopecia areata (AA).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 546
-
Are at least 18 years and ≤60 years for males (≤70 years of age for females) at the time of informed consent.
-
Have severe or very severe AA, as determined by all of the following:
- Current AA episode of more than 6 months' duration and hair loss encompassing ≥50% of the scalp, as measured by SALT (AA-IGA of 3 or 4) at screening and baseline.
- No spontaneous improvement over the past 6 months.
- Current episode of severe or very severe AA of less than 8 years. Note: participants who have severe or very severe AA for ≥8 years may be enrolled if episodes of regrowth, spontaneous or under treatment, have been observed on the affected areas over the past 8 years.
-
Male or nonpregnant, nonbreastfeeding female participants.
- Primarily "diffuse" type of AA.
- Are currently experiencing other forms of alopecia or any other concomitant conditions that would interfere with evaluations of the effect of study medication on AA.
- Previously treated with an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor and had an inadequate response (for example, absence of significant terminal hair growth after at least 12 weeks of treatment).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2 mg Baricitinib Placebo Participants received one 2 mg Baricitinib tablet administered orally QD, and one placebo tablet administered orally QD to maintain blind. Placebo Placebo Participants received two placebo tablets administered orally QD to maintain the blind. 4 Milligram (mg) Baricitinib Placebo Participants received one 4 mg Baricitinib tablet administered orally, every day (QD) one placebo tablet administered orally QD to maintain blind. 4 mg Baricitinib Maximum Extended Enrollment (MEE) Placebo Participants received one 4 mg Baricitinib tablet administered orally, every day (QD) one placebo tablet administered orally QD to maintain blind. Placebo MEE Placebo Participants received two placebo tablets administered orally QD to maintain the blind. 2 mg Baricitinib Baricitinib Participants received one 2 mg Baricitinib tablet administered orally QD, and one placebo tablet administered orally QD to maintain blind. 4 Milligram (mg) Baricitinib Baricitinib Participants received one 4 mg Baricitinib tablet administered orally, every day (QD) one placebo tablet administered orally QD to maintain blind. 4 mg Baricitinib Maximum Extended Enrollment (MEE) Baricitinib Participants received one 4 mg Baricitinib tablet administered orally, every day (QD) one placebo tablet administered orally QD to maintain blind. 2 mg Baricitinib MEE Baricitinib Participants received one 2 mg Baricitinib tablet administered orally QD, and one placebo tablet administered orally QD to maintain blind.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Achieving Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) ≤ 20 Week 36 The SALT uses a visual aid showing the division of the scalp hair into 4 areas with the top of the head constituting 40% of total surface, the posterior/back of head 24%, right side and left side of head 18% each. The percentage of hair loss in each area is determined and is multiplied by the percentage of scalp covered by that area. The total sum of the 4 products of each area will give the SALT score, as developed by the National Alopecia Areata Foundation Working Committee. Only terminal hair is included in the SALT; vellus hair or any fine downy hair is not taken into account in the SALT scoring process. The SALT score will range from 0% to 100%, with lower score indicating better health outcomes.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) for Scalp Hair Assessment Score of 0 or 1 With a ≥2-point Improvement From Baseline Among Participants With a Score of ≥3 at Baseline Week 36 PRO is an assessment of the particpant's current extent of scalp involvement. It is comprised of 5 category response options: 0= No missing hair (0% of my scalp is missing hair; I have a full head of hair); 1 = A limited area (1% to 20% of my scalp is missing hair); 2 = A moderate area (21% to 49% of my scalp is missing hair); 3 = A large area (50% to 94% of my scalp is missing hair); and 4 = Nearly all or all (95% to 100% of my scalp is missing hair).
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinician-Reported Outcome (ClinRO) Measure for Eyebrow (EB) Hair Loss 0 or 1 With ≥2-point Improvement From Baseline (Among Participants With ClinRO Measure for EB Hair Loss ≥2 at Baseline) Week 36 ClinRO is a clinician reported assessment which measures a participant's EB hair loss. It is comprised of 4 category response options: 0 = EB have full coverage and no areas of hair loss; 1 = There are minimal gaps in EB hair and distribution is even; 2 = There are significant gaps in EB hair or distribution is not even; 3 = No notable EB.
Change From Baseline in Skindex-16 AA Functioning Domain Score at Week 36 Baseline, Week 36 Skindex-16 AA was adapted from Skindex-16 for use among adults with alopecia areata. It examines the degree to which the participant is bothered by alopecia (hair loss) and associated symptoms. It is composed of 16 items grouped under 3 domains: Symptoms (4 items), Emotions (7 items), and Functioning (5 items). The score of each item ranges from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). Symptoms domain score is sum of 4 items, range 0 to 24; Emotions domain score is sum of 7 items, range 0 to 42; Functioning score is sum of 5 items, range 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate a greater impact on quality of life.
LS means was calculated using the ANCOVA model with geographic region, duration of current episode at Baseline (\<4 years vs. ≥ 4years), treatment group, and baseline value as fixed factors.Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement of Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT50) Week 12 SALT uses a visual aid showing the division of the scalp hair into 4 areas with the top of the head constituting 40% of total surface, the posterior/back of head 24%, right side and left side of head 18% each. The percentage of hair loss in each area is determined and is multiplied by the percentage of scalp covered by that area. The total sum of the 4 products of each area will give the SALT score, as developed by the National Alopecia Areata Foundation Working Committee. Only terminal hair is included in the SALT; vellus hair or any fine downy hair is not taken into account in the SALT scoring process. The SALT score will range from 0% to 100%, with lower score indicating better health outcomes. SALT50 indicates at least a 50 % improvement from baseline in the SALT score.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure for EB 0 or 1 With ≥2-point Improvement From Baseline (Among Participants With PRO Measure for EB ≥2 at Baseline) Week 36 PRO is an assessment of the participant's current appearance of eyebrows. It is comprised of 4 category response options: 0 = I have full EB on each eye; 1= I have a minimal gap(s) or a minimal amount of thinning in at least 1 of my EB; 2 = I have a large gap(s) or a large amount of thinning in at least 1 of my EB; and 3 = I have no or barely any EB hairs.
Percent Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 36 Baseline, Week 36 SALT uses a visual aid showing the division of the scalp hair into4 areas with the top of the head constituting 40% of total surface, the posterior/back of head 24%, right side and left side of head 18% each. The percentage of hair loss in each area is determined and is multiplied by the percentage of scalp covered by that area. The total sum of the 4 products of each area will give the SALT score. Only terminal hair is included in the SALT; vellus hair or any fine downy hair is not taken into account in the SALT scoring process. The SALT score will range from 0% to 100%, with lower score indicating better health outcomes. Least Squares Mean (LSM) was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with geographic region duration of current episode at baseline (\< 4 years versus ≥4 years), treatment group, and baseline value in the model.
Time for Participants to Achieve SALT ≤ 20 Week 52 Time for participants to achieve SALT ≤ 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving ClinRO Measure for Eyelash (EL) Hair Loss 0 or 1 With ≥2-point Improvement From Baseline (Among Participants With ClinRO Measure for EL Hair Loss ≥2 at Baseline) Week 36 ClinRO measure for EL hair loss is comprised of 4 category response options: 0 = The EL form a continuous line along the eyelids on both eyes; 1 = There are minimal gaps and the EL are evenly spaced along the eyelids on both eyes; 2 = There are significant gaps along the eyelids or the EL are not evenly spaced along the eyelids; 3 = No notable EL.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PRO Measure for EL 0 or 1 With ≥2-point Improvement From Baseline (Among Participants With PRO Measure EL ≥2 at Baseline) Week 36 PRO assessment of the participant's current appearance of EL. It is comprised of 4 category response options: 0 = I have full EL on each eyelid; 1 = I have a minimal gap or minimal gaps along the eyelids; 2 = I have a large gap or large gaps along the eyelids; and 3 = I have no or barely any EL hair.
Change From Baseline in Skindex-16 Alopecia Areata (AA) Symptoms Domain Score Baseline, Week 36 Skindex-16 AA was adapted from Skindex-16 for use among adults with alopecia areata. It examines the degree to which the participant is bothered by alopecia (hair loss) and associated symptoms. It is composed of 16 items grouped under 3 domains: Symptoms (4 items), Emotions (7 items), and Functioning (5 items). The score of each item ranges from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). Symptoms domain score is sum of 4 items, range 0 to 24; Emotions domain score is sum of 7 items, range 0 to 42; Functioning score is sum of 5 items, range 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate a greater impact on quality of life.
LS means was calculated using the ANCOVA model with geographic region, duration of current episode at Baseline (\<4 years vs. ≥ 4years), treatment group, and baseline value as fixed factors.Change From Baseline in Skindex-16 AA Emotions Domain Score at Week 36 Baseline, Week 36 Skindex-16 AA was adapted from Skindex-16 for use among adults with alopecia areata. It examines the degree to which the participant is bothered by alopecia (hair loss) and associated symptoms. It is composed of 16 items grouped under 3 domains: Symptoms (4 items), Emotions (7 items), and Functioning (5 items). The score of each item ranges from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). Symptoms domain score is sum of 4 items, range 0 to 24; Emotions domain score is sum of 7 items, range 0 to 42; Functioning score is sum of 5 items, range 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate a greater impact on quality of life.
LS means was calculated using the ANCOVA model with geographic region, duration of current episode at Baseline (\<4 years vs. ≥ 4years), treatment group, and baseline value as fixed factors.Mean Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Score at Week 36 Baseline, Week 36 The HADS is a 14-item self-assessment scale that determines the levels of anxiety and depression that a patient is experiencing over the past week. The HADS utilizes a 4-point Likert scale (for example, 0 to 3) for each question and is intended for ages 12 to 65 years. Scores for each domain (anxiety and depression) can range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety or depression.
LS mean was calculated using an ANCOVA model which includes geographic region, duration of current episode at baseline (\<4 years vs. ≥4 years), treatment group and baseline score as fixed factors.Mean Change From Baseline in HADS Depression Score at Week 36 Baseline,Week 36 The HADS is a 14-item self-assessment scale that determines the levels of anxiety and depression that a patient is experiencing over the past week. The HADS utilizes a 4-point Likert scale (for example, 0 to 3) for each question and is intended for ages 12 to 65 years. Scores for each domain (anxiety and depression) can range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety or depression.
LS mean was calculated using an ANCOVA model which includes geographic region, duration of current episode at baseline (\<4 years vs. ≥4 years), treatment group and baseline score as fixed factors.
Trial Locations
- Locations (96)
Centro de Investigaciones Médicas Tucuman
🇦🇷SAN M. DE Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina
Hospital de Clínicas Da Universidade Estadual de Campinas
🇧🇷Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
🇧🇷Santo André, Sao Paulo, Brazil
IPITEC
🇧🇷São Paulo, Brazil
Servidor Público Estadual - IAMSPE - centro de estudos urológicos
🇧🇷São Paulo, Brazil
Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center, PC
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Investigate MD
🇺🇸Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Center For Dermatology Clinical Research, Inc.
🇺🇸Fremont, California, United States
Quest Dermatology Research
🇺🇸Northridge, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Hospital
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States
New England Research Associates
🇺🇸Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
Florida Academic Centers Research and Education, LLC
🇺🇸Coral Gables, Florida, United States
New Horizon Research Center
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
ForCare Clinical Research
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
The South Bend Clinic Center for Research
🇺🇸South Bend, Indiana, United States
Qualmedica Research, LLC
🇺🇸Owensboro, Kentucky, United States
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Specialists
🇺🇸Rockville, Maryland, United States
Tufts Medical Center
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.
🇺🇸Bay City, Michigan, United States
Hamzavi Dermatology
🇺🇸Fort Gratiot, Michigan, United States
Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
🇺🇸Chesterfield, Michigan, United States
Associated Skin Care Specialists
🇺🇸New Brighton, Minnesota, United States
Joseph J. Schwartz, M.D.
🇺🇸Troy, New York, United States
MediSearch Clinical Trials
🇺🇸Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
🇺🇸Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Dermatology Specialists of Charlotte
🇺🇸Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
M3-Emerging Medical Research
🇺🇸Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Bexley Dermatology Research
🇺🇸Bexley, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Dermatologists of Southwest Ohio
🇺🇸Mason, Ohio, United States
Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, P.C.
🇺🇸Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Northwest Dermatology Institute
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
Velocity Clinical Research, Providence
🇺🇸East Greenwich, Rhode Island, United States
Suzanne Bruce and Associates, PA
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Progressive Clinical Research
🇺🇸San Antonio, Texas, United States
Virginia Clinical Research, Inc.
🇺🇸Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Stat Research
🇦🇷Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Instituto de Neumonología y Dermatología
🇦🇷Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Centro de Investigaciones Metabólicas (CINME)
🇦🇷Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Fundacion Respirar
🇦🇷Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
Buenos Aires Skin
🇦🇷Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma De Buenos Aires, Argentina
Parra Dermatología
🇦🇷Mendoza, Argentina
Woden Dermatology
🇦🇺Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia
🇦🇺Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd
🇦🇺Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd
🇦🇺Campbelltown, South Australia, Australia
Skin Health Institute Inc.
🇦🇺Carlton, Victoria, Australia
Sinclair Dermatology
🇦🇺Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Fremantle Dermatology
🇦🇺Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre
🇧🇷Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil
Centro de Pesquisa Sao Lucas
🇧🇷Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
IDERJ - Instituto de Dermatologia e Estética do Brasil
🇧🇷Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
IBPClin - Instituto Brasil de Pesquisa Clínica
🇧🇷Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University
🇨🇳Beijing, Beijing, China
Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliate of Capital University
🇨🇳Beijing, Beijing, China
Chinese PLA General Hospital
🇨🇳Beijing, Beijing, China
Peking University Third Hospital
🇨🇳Beijing, Beijing, China
Guangdong Province Dermatology Hospital
🇨🇳Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
🇨🇳Changsha, Hunan, China
Jiangsu Province Hospital
🇨🇳Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University
🇨🇳Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
🇨🇳Xi'An, Shaanxi, China
HuaShan Hospital Affiliated To Fudan University
🇨🇳Shanghai, Shanghai, China
Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital
🇨🇳Shanghai, Shanghai, China
First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
🇨🇳Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
🇨🇳Tianjin, Tianjin, China
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
🇨🇳Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Soroka Medical Center
🇮🇱Beer Sheva, HaDarom, Israel
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
🇨🇳Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Rabin Medical Center
🇮🇱Petach Tikva, HaMerkaz, Israel
Sheba Medical Center
🇮🇱Ramat Gan, HaMerkaz, Israel
Emek Medical Center
🇮🇱Afula, HaTsafon, Israel
Rambam Medical Center
🇮🇱Haifa, HaTsafon, Israel
Sourasky Medical Center
🇮🇱Tel Aviv, Tell Abīb, Israel
Hadassah Medical Center
🇮🇱Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
Yokohama Rosai Hospital
🇯🇵Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Hamamatsu University Hospital
🇯🇵Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
Juntendo University Hospital
🇯🇵Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center
🇯🇵Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Yamaguchi University Hospital
🇯🇵Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
Osaka City University Hospital
🇯🇵Osaka, Japan
Dankook University Hospital
🇰🇷Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea, Republic of
Kyorin University Hospital
🇯🇵Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
Tokyo Medical Univ. Hospital
🇯🇵Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital
🇰🇷Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
Boramae Medical Center
🇰🇷Dongjak-gu, Seoul-teukbyeolsi [Seoul], Korea, Republic of
Kyunghee University Hospital at Gangdong
🇰🇷Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi [Seoul], Korea, Republic of
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Clinical Research Puerto Rico
🇵🇷San Juan, Puerto Rico
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
🇨🇳Taichung city, Taichung, Taiwan
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
🇨🇳Tainan, Taiwan
Ajou University Hospital
🇰🇷Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
National Taiwan University Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei City, Taiwan
Chang Gung Medical Foundation-Linkou Branch
🇨🇳Taoyuan, Taiwan