Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01005836
NCT01005836
Completed
Not Applicable

Community Clinic Test of Youth Anxiety and Depression Study

Harvard University0 sites105 target enrollmentFebruary 1998

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Anxiety
Sponsor
Harvard University
Enrollment
105
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Structured, manualized treatments have been developed for numerous mental health problems and disorders among children and adolescents, and a number of these have shown strong beneficial effects in clinical trials. Such findings have led to proposals that the empirically supported treatments be used to improve outcomes of conventional clinic treatment, which some research suggests may not be very effective. But can these lab-tested treatments actually work in service-oriented clinics with referred youth? Available evidence cannot tell us, because the therapists, conditions, and clientele in the laboratory efficacy tests tend to differ so markedly from those of clinical practice. To assess the clinical potential of efficacy-tested treatments, we need effectiveness research that tests these treatments in the crucible of clinical practice. To help begin this process, the proposed research focuses on a specific treatment program for a specific cluster of disorders: Kendall's (1994) cognitive-behavioral "Coping Cat" program for child and adolescent anxiety disorders. The program has shown unusually positive effects across a series of clinical trials in the U.S. and Australia, but it has never been tested in real-world clinical conditions. The proposed study will test the effectiveness of the treatment with clinic-referred youth, treated in community clinics, with the treatment carried out by clinic staff therapists. Some 128 youth, aged 9-14, referred for anxiety and diagnosed with anxiety disorders, will be randomly assigned to receive either the usual treatment in the clinic, or the Kendall program, carried out by clinic staff who have been trained to proficiency. Therapists for the two treatment conditions will also be chosen randomly, from a pool of volunteers. Outcome assessment at immediate post-treatment, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups, will test effects across many outcomes. It is hypothesized that outcomes for youths treated using the cognitive-behavioral treatment will be superior to those treated using usual care.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 1998
End Date
May 2005
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

John Weisz

Professor and Primary Investigator

Harvard University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Primary DSM-IV anxiety or depressive disorder

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pervasive developmental disorder
  • Psychotic disorder
  • Mental retardation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials