MedPath

Effect of Manual Therapy on Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Temporomandibular Disorder
Neck Pain
Registration Number
NCT07210957
Lead Sponsor
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Brief Summary

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are multifactorial conditions involving the temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles, often presenting with pain and functional limitations. Conventional management includes splints, pharmacological approaches, physiotherapy, and manual therapy. This study aims to evaluate the effects of manual therapy compared to therapeutic exercise on muscle thickness, pain pressure threshold, range of motion, pain, mandibular function, and anxiety in individuals with TMD.

Detailed Description

TMD affects approximately one-quarter of the population and is characterized by pain, restricted movement, and impaired mandibular function. Etiology is multifactorial, including occlusal issues, trauma, bruxism, stress, and postural alterations. Bruxism in particular contributes to repetitive loading and hypertonia of the masticatory and cervical muscles, potentially influencing global posture. Current treatment approaches range from occlusal splints and surgery to conservative physiotherapy, manual therapy, and exercise. While manual therapy may reduce pain and restore mobility through techniques such as joint mobilization, myofascial release, and muscle inhibition, exercise supports improvements in strength, endurance, coordination, and joint stability. Evidence suggests that combined approaches may provide additive benefits. This trial will compare manual therapy and therapeutic exercise interventions in patients with TMD over six weeks. Objective outcomes will include ultrasound-based muscle thickness, pain pressure threshold, mandibular range of motion, pain intensity, and mandibular function. Anxiety levels will also be assessed using validated questionnaires. The primary hypothesis is that manual therapy will produce greater improvements across these measures compared to exercise.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
48
Inclusion Criteria
  • Myalgia, and both myalgia and arthralgia according to Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders
  • Completing signing the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
  • Any rheumatological or metabolic disease
  • Receiving any treatment for temporomandibular joint in the last 2 years (such as botulinum toxin, manual therapy, splint, orthodontics)
  • A history of traumatic temporomandibular joint
  • A history of diagnosed psychological diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ultrasound AssessmentBaseline, sixth week

Muscle thickness of the masseter and temporalis will be measured with a linear probe in neutral rest and during submaximal teeth clenching (supine). The probe will be aligned to standard anatomical landmarks, kept perpendicular to the skin without compressing soft tissue. Thickness will be recorded in millimeters as the distance between the internal and external fascia. Each muscle will be assessed once per condition.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain Pressure ThresholdBaseline, sixth week

A handheld algometer (1 cm² probe tip, 0-40 kg/cm² range, 0.1 kg increments) will be applied perpendicularly to the masseter, temporalis, upper trapezius, suboccipital muscles, and the C5 facet joint bilaterally. Participants will signal at first pain. Three measurements per site will be taken at 30-second intervals; the mean value (kg/cm²) will be used.

Maximum Mouth Opening and Lateral ExcursionBaseline, sixth week

Measured in millimeters using a manual ruler between the upper and lower central incisors. Maximum unassisted opening will be recorded in supine. For lateral excursion, participants will move the mandible to the right and left as far as possible; distances will be recorded for each side. Pain or discomfort will be noted.

Mandibular Function ScaleBaseline, sixth week

Self-report questionnaire with two parts: functional activities (speaking, smiling, chewing, etc.) and nutrition (difficulty with oral feeding). Each item is scored 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (severe difficulty). Higher total scores indicate greater dysfunction.

State-Trait Anxiety InventoryBaseline, sixth week

Consists of 40 items: 20 assessing state anxiety and 20 assessing trait anxiety. Each item is scored 1-4, giving subscale totals of 20-80. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder ScaleBaseline, sixth week

A 7-item self-report questionnaire assessing generalized anxiety over the past 2 weeks. Each item is scored 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total score ranges 0-21; scores 5, 10, and 15 represent cut-offs for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.